Subject: Re: [httpwg/http-extensions] make title consistent with WG terminology (#277)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:04:12 -0800

I have struggled with the naming from the start, and am open to any suggestions on that, with the single caveat that making the name too long is probably not a good idea without at good acronym.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/277#issuecomment-276652251