Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] Definition of Expect-CT is a little unclear (#318)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:53:49 -0700

The convention for HTTP is to define header fields as follows:

```
<header-field-name> = #<header-field-name>-fields
```

Which leads to me suggesting:

```abnf
Expect-CT = #Expect-CT-Directives
Expect-CT-Directives = [ parameter *( OWS ";" OWS parameter ) ]
```

Note that this doesn't follow the common structure, which uses:

```abnf
common-structure = 1* ( identifier dictionary )
```

Ignore the obvious errors in the common structure syntax, the intent is to have a list of identifiers followed by dictionaries.

I've marked this as editorial, I think that the outcome will not affect the wire syntax at all.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/318