Subject: [midcom] Protocol Eval: 2.2.11 More precise rulesets contradict....

From: Martin Stiemerling <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:37:10 +0200

- MEGACO
The text says "This requirement would be met if the policy [...] allows ..."
What is meant with this text? Sounds like that this depends heavily on a 
new packager that has to be defined. So the compliance is 'P+'.

-- 
Martin Stiemerling

NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories  [email-masked]
IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de  IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom