Subject: Re: [avtext] [IANA #966456] Evaluation: <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05.txt> to Proposed Standard

From: Jonathan Lennox <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:08:06 +0000

As LRR’s behavior is intended to be largely the same as FIR, the next version of the draft will indicate that its mux category is IDENTICAL-PER-PT, as FIR’s is.  (I’m Cc’ing the working group, just in case.)

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 4:57 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> IESG:
> 
> IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> Registry Actions - YES
> 
> We still need the authors to tell us how to fill in the "Mux" column for the Codec Control Messages registration.
> 
> We're also waiting for a review from the FMT Values for PSFB Payload Types experts.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
>