From lha at it.su.se Thu Jul 13 09:34:04 2006 From: lha at it.su.se (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?=) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:34:04 +0200 Subject: [anonsec] ietf66 btns minutes Message-ID: Hello, I just published the minutes for the meeting on the meeting materials website. I've included the parts for that needs to be confirmed on the mailing list and action item below. http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/minutes/btns.txt Love * Decisions made - Two document for the API documents One for SPD manipulation and one for channel bindings. * Action items - AS/PS document submitted by August. - Steve Kent should send PAD/SPD examples to Nicolas and Michael for BTNS-core document. - btns-core: fix inconsistency issues and update the tables to describe missing fields. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/attachments/20060713/455fa254/PGP.bin From lha at it.su.se Thu Jul 13 09:54:46 2006 From: lha at it.su.se (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?=) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:54:46 +0200 Subject: [anonsec] btns - ietf66 Message-ID: <55A9ED29-BA9C-41BE-B52E-3D5FDADE8C5D@it.su.se> BTNS meet on Tuesday on IETF66. We discussed the problem and applicability statement document. It should be done for WG-LC in August. One of the issues that came up is how to deal with credential caching and leap of faith (and to define that mean) and how much that that is in scope for BTNS. The core document describing BTNS have progress nicely and there are very few outstanding issues on the document. We have started to look at the API problem that the WG is charted to work on. There will probably be two documents describing the API, one for channel bindings and one for SPD/PAD manipulation. We had a decision if there was any overlap with the work from SHIM6 and HIP, but the WG thought there was none and that we didn't need to coordinate our efforts. Love -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/attachments/20060713/de0b7f6d/PGP.bin From miika at iki.fi Thu Jul 13 10:06:06 2006 From: miika at iki.fi (Miika Komu) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:06:06 +0300 (EEST) Subject: [anonsec] btns - ietf66 In-Reply-To: <55A9ED29-BA9C-41BE-B52E-3D5FDADE8C5D@it.su.se> References: <55A9ED29-BA9C-41BE-B52E-3D5FDADE8C5D@it.su.se> Message-ID: On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Love H?rnquist ?strand wrote: > We have started to look at the API problem that the WG is charted to > work on. There will probably be two documents describing the API, one > for channel bindings and one for SPD/PAD manipulation. We had a > decision if there was any overlap with the work from SHIM6 and HIP, > but the WG thought there was none and that we didn't need to > coordinate our efforts. I thought that the decision was that there is no overlap with SHIM6 and BTNS? At least we have been discussing with Michael that we could have some shared APIs with HIP and BTNS. -- Miika Komu http://www.iki.fi/miika/ From lha at it.su.se Thu Jul 13 10:31:14 2006 From: lha at it.su.se (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?=) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:31:14 +0200 Subject: [anonsec] btns - ietf66 In-Reply-To: References: <55A9ED29-BA9C-41BE-B52E-3D5FDADE8C5D@it.su.se> Message-ID: <0EE60D29-C864-439C-9701-240183D9A99B@it.su.se> 13 jul 2006 kl. 19.06 skrev Miika Komu: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Love H?rnquist ?strand wrote: > >> We have started to look at the API problem that the WG is charted to >> work on. There will probably be two documents describing the API, one >> for channel bindings and one for SPD/PAD manipulation. We had a >> decision if there was any overlap with the work from SHIM6 and HIP, >> but the WG thought there was none and that we didn't need to >> coordinate our efforts. > > I thought that the decision was that there is no overlap with SHIM6 > and BTNS? At least we have been discussing with Michael that we > could have some shared APIs with HIP and BTNS. My note is clearly wrong, I mis-understod what Micheal told us. There is overlap with HIP. Micheal and you seem to have this already ironed out how to deal with it. Love -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/attachments/20060713/24219465/PGP.bin From hartmans-ietf at mit.edu Mon Jul 31 06:11:57 2006 From: hartmans-ietf at mit.edu (Sam Hartman) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:11:57 -0400 Subject: [anonsec] [saag] IPsec configuration via BGP--softwires to support overlay network confidentiality/integrity In-Reply-To: <44B2D50C.5020508@cisco.com> (Mark Townsley's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:30:36 -0400") References: <44B2D50C.5020508@cisco.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Townsley writes: Mark> Sam, was there any response to this? Yes. The responses were all positive.