From nobody Sat Nov 11 19:58:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E027E1201FA for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:58:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyTA0XvNMJGH for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:57:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6497120721 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n61so16101977qte.10 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:57:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R9atyVZyck6yFugM2fRt0YRBSjyHL2LAkERQ66mSXhE=; b=nzPOXeqidqzXU93d3XRrcs7qbL1RAVPy/BPM8HWD41DgNeFuJEEQVrrYWh46VZRvAQ FrZVDY9f08oqnYZ0ncipsTL/fZubLyFCRBx8UQ3APlKXwtZMqvr2NUUNqB0TSFLcC3Xx heXvyuAoaNobRppYJWaLQVcl0n6eCqRsL9aNL61pFU0KLvkbKH6+7frG3o1c3ASL25P0 wOopcbl+qZ9UzfhvG1xjq3Rt9ke0STn7bRiw14XTZ/9FuhJp7aJWAjnxpaMPL/dN7pUs jJPM6bOUTlikV8ubggkqmaQIo4UZFl+YX/cqTn9Obf/a3kXN8T+1mJmL/SjWJNKx3eXp 3KdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R9atyVZyck6yFugM2fRt0YRBSjyHL2LAkERQ66mSXhE=; b=jThKnma+yih1p/coz76CaYpBBqQRy0qJxG6VJwpRXokpPG56RcrUjaMW+pKSdt/Nhq LAAiFrBMIbTia3Q9ZqouPupET7G7Vi11Gd9tB/Khe0X8xtW9DBQgqtPAr0QtwLnhVger QYI2XZa/gzue79Gyko8o6zFisZwbmWA5IHr6pmJUR+4+WTXNKaqRgAUX3ftR33mrhdil bkF9gfHUe2MjCN1rwdK4zUn0D+H0WGtJQiyfhSAPsPhu+vkoOnc1+UQhix4KPN3NAJTT A6Jq9ELXX7OlsLxNgySYXoMvahFwZEtj4ebPf2YJo9m8P3KObOUdwUcLPTFzpA1Oj1hn 8H+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4f4xs3YeMJAkWGILTg8vpXUAGOwP/DV+JQP77ak3eGIg3jKGxA Ka29UKg9G5DDGmcAHpa7j/3Jb6mmL+j1GzmL5ao= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbmnceXNyCb2DKnhAK2M6aomnJ+W30HJqK39XfzIM5hYvGYGlKbrHeep7kAtzd/I2IwfUTqj2yoH9/JdeF3JRo= X-Received: by 10.200.34.245 with SMTP id g50mr8229231qta.62.1510459078078; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:57:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.67 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 19:57:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <59F5D882.30707@isode.com> <20171029171122.6058066.50773.7002@gmail.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 06:57:57 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Paterson, Kenny" Cc: Stephen Farrell , Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d3518cbf71c055dc128fc" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:58:01 -0000 --001a113d3518cbf71c055dc128fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Kenny and Alexey, The review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 has been posted to the CFRG mailing list. Best regards, Stanislav 2017-10-30 1:15 GMT+08:00 Paterson, Kenny : > Hi Stanislav, > > Two weeks would be just fine - thanks! > > Kenny > > On 29/10/2017 17:11, "=D0=A1=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=BB=D0=B0=D0= =B2 =D0=A1=D0=BC=D1=8B=D1=88=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=B5=D0=B2" w= rote: > > >Dear Kenny, > > > >I'll be happy to do it. =E2=80=8EWill it be appropriate, if it takes me = two weeks? > > > >Kind regards, > >Stanislav=E2=80=8E > >=E2=80=8E > > =D0=98=D1=81=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B5 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0= =B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5 > >=D0=9E=D1=82: Paterson, Kenny > >=D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE: =D0=B2=D0= =BE=D1=81=D0=BA=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=8C=D0=B5, 29 =D0=BE=D0=BA= =D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2017 =D0=B3., 19:05 > >=D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83: Stephen Farrell; Alexey Melnikov; crypto-panel= @irtf.org > >=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-m= cgrew-hash-sigs-08 > > > >Thanks Stephen - much appreciated. We'll see what other volunteers we ge= t. > >We've another document coming up for the review panel right away, which > >might be better suited to your interests. > > > >Cheers > > > >Kenny > > > >On 29/10/2017 14:39, "Crypto-panel on behalf of Stephen Farrell" > > > >wrote: > > > >> > >>Hiya, > >> > >>On 29/10/17 13:32, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >>> Dear Crypto Panel, > >>> > >>> CFRG Chairs would like to request review of > >>> before > >>> forwarding it to IRSG for final review and approval. > >>> > >>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? > >> > >>I'm willing to take a peek. But you may be better to > >>put me at the end of the volunteer list - my only real > >>knowledge here is what I learned from reviewing the > >>xmss spec. But if you're stuck and/or think that's > >>useful I could do it. > >> > >>S. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Kenny and Alexey > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Crypto-panel mailing list > >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > >>> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Crypto-panel mailing list > >Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > --001a113d3518cbf71c055dc128fc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Kenny and Alexey,

The review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 has been post= ed to the CFRG mailing list.

Best regards,
Stanislav

2017-10-30 1:15 GMT+08:00 Paterson, Kenny <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>:
Hi Stanislav,

Two weeks would be just fine - thanks!

Kenny

On 29/10/2017 17:11, "=D0=A1=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=BB=D0=B0= =D0=B2 =D0=A1=D0=BC=D1=8B=D1=88=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=B5=D0=B2" <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:

>Dear Kenny,
>
>I'll be happy to do it. =E2=80=8EWill it be appropriate, if it take= s me two weeks?
>
>Kind regards,
>Stanislav=E2=80=8E
>=E2=80=8E
>=C2=A0 =D0=98=D1=81=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B5 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0= =BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5
>=D0=9E=D1=82: Paterson, Kenny
>=D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE: =D0=B2=D0= =BE=D1=81=D0=BA=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=8C=D0=B5, 29 =D0=BE=D0=BA= =D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2017 =D0=B3., 19:05
>=D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83: Stephen Farrell; Alexey Melnikov; crypto-panel@irtf.org
>=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-= mcgrew-hash-sigs-08
>
>Thanks Stephen - much appreciated. We'll see what other volunteers = we get.
>We've another document coming up for the review panel right away, w= hich
>might be better suited to your interests.
>
>Cheers
>
>Kenny
>
>On 29/10/2017 14:39, "Crypto-panel on behalf of Stephen Farrell&qu= ot;
><crypto-panel-bounc= es@irtf.org on behalf of stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Hiya,
>>
>>On 29/10/17 13:32, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> Dear Crypto Panel,
>>>
>>> CFRG Chairs would like to request review of
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.or= g/doc/draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs/> before
>>> forwarding it to IRSG for final review and approval.
>>>
>>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please?
>>
>>I'm willing to take a peek. But you may be better to
>>put me at the end of the volunteer list - my only real
>>knowledge here is what I learned from reviewing the
>>xmss spec. But if you're stuck and/or think that's
>>useful I could do it.
>>
>>S.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kenny and Alexey
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org=
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/lis= tinfo/crypto-panel
>>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Crypto-panel mailing list
>Crypto-panel@irtf.org
>https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cry= pto-panel


--001a113d3518cbf71c055dc128fc-- From nobody Sat Nov 11 20:14:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260D7124234 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 20:14:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sD-XOqB7G0XV for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 20:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BDF1201FA for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 20:14:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1510460052; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=+WOYbr/zJMmNDzckNy11DaBEnY+zL5YQqA1/zN5Wcek=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=aDvkUt/kFbcVGUKZMm2+W0lFOOwvt8FAlTuAdH1vzWLzqxGuMnO6gDtVTA7yE0JgOvNlzP VX3VIhSeesF0vVBw1y3ljZA12TXnKk79gnUcOqt9yQIX7F8TQyr3m/Y96xleMvGm/jHBeK aARJ01Ub/t5YX70tgy73EVaRpuGLQ10=; Received: from [31.133.129.3] (dhcp-8103.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.129.3]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 04:14:11 +0000 To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" , "Paterson, Kenny" References: <59F5D882.30707@isode.com> <20171029171122.6058066.50773.7002@gmail.com> Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Stephen Farrell From: Alexey Melnikov Message-ID: <5A07CA90.4080204@isode.com> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:14:08 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 04:14:15 -0000 On 12/11/2017 11:57, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev wrote: > Dear Kenny and Alexey, >=20 > The review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 has been posted to the CFRG > mailing list. Thank you very much. > Best regards, > Stanislav >=20 > 2017-10-30 1:15 GMT+08:00 Paterson, Kenny >: >=20 > Hi Stanislav, >=20 > Two weeks would be just fine - thanks! >=20 > Kenny >=20 > On 29/10/2017 17:11, "=D0=A1=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=BB=D0=B0= =D0=B2 =D0=A1=D0=BC=D1=8B=D1=88=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=B5=D0=B2" > wrote: >=20 > >Dear Kenny, > > > >I'll be happy to do it. =E2=80=8EWill it be appropriate, if it takes = me two > weeks? > > > >Kind regards, > >Stanislav=E2=80=8E > >=E2=80=8E > > =D0=98=D1=81=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B5 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE= =D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5 > >=D0=9E=D1=82: Paterson, Kenny > >=D0=9E=D1=82=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BE: =D0=B2= =D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BA=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=8C=D0=B5, 29 =D0=BE=D0= =BA=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2017 =D0=B3., 19:05 > >=D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83: Stephen Farrell; Alexey Melnikov; crypto-pa= nel@irtf.org > > >=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draf= t-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 > > > >Thanks Stephen - much appreciated. We'll see what other volunteers > we get. > >We've another document coming up for the review panel right away, whi= ch > >might be better suited to your interests. > > > >Cheers > > > >Kenny > > > >On 29/10/2017 14:39, "Crypto-panel on behalf of Stephen Farrell" > > on behalf of > stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie > > >wrote: > > > >> > >>Hiya, > >> > >>On 29/10/17 13:32, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >>> Dear Crypto Panel, > >>> > >>> CFRG Chairs would like to request review of > >>> > before > >>> forwarding it to IRSG for final review and approval. > >>> > >>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? > >> > >>I'm willing to take a peek. But you may be better to > >>put me at the end of the volunteer list - my only real > >>knowledge here is what I learned from reviewing the > >>xmss spec. But if you're stuck and/or think that's > >>useful I could do it. > >> > >>S. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Kenny and Alexey > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Crypto-panel mailing list > >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > >>> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Crypto-panel mailing list > >Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >=20 From nobody Thu Nov 16 04:21:56 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028CB12947E; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:21:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uni-paderborn.de Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tK-dRdmgivQ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de (mail.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.142.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 145EB129476; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:21:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-paderborn.de; s=20170601; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4IRtF3tKH1nqGtfK/oaxi0S5+v2z9Pg0dIlrpin3TAU=; b=f0H+rctKQ39O0TYlZTrNY55NL8 /Yj9CTXUPAGgFO0a1hNjZlvN0sk7Pf2IG50GkJompWl2v3UDfxNEOSpjI8kVxRub6o1YVB93saQMs onjVhtZWSqZUyxab3ido5sOs4i9CS88a+8TRAJW9Al29Yq1x88EiDKQNFvP+EtiWTdvE=; To: "Paterson, Kenny" References: <59F5D882.30707@isode.com> Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , cfrg@irtf.org, mcgrew@cisco.com From: Tibor Jager Message-ID: <83851479-b427-c7d5-798f-03a791c5d5be@upb.de> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:21:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IMT-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-PMX-Version: 6.3.3.2656215, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.11.16.120316, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.43.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2017.11.16.5430001 X-IMT-Authenticated-Sender: uid=tjager,ou=People,o=upb,c=de Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:21:49 -0000 Dear all, Please find my review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-08 below. Cheers, Tibor Summary: The proposal is very carefully written and complete. I like very much that it provides helpful overview sections, good examples and is *extremely* clear. There are no major comments or concerns, but a few minor comments and recommendations. Among the points listed below, I consider a generalization of the discussion of race conditions that may lead to multiple signatures signed with the same state as the most important one. I've also checked the pseudocodes, but just by reading and not implementing them, so I may have missed something there. Minor comments: p.2: The "small private key" holds only if the keys are generated using the procedure from Appendix A (or any other pseudorandom function). I suggest to replace: "The characteristics of these signature systems are small private and public keys and fast signature generation and verification, but large signatures and moderatley slow key generation (in comparison with RSA and ECDSA)." -> "The characteristics of these signature systems are small public keys and fast signature generation and verification, but large signatures and moderatley slow key generation (in comparison with RSA and ECDSA). Private keys can be made very small by appropriate key generation, as described in Appendix A." p.2: I suggest to clarify by replacing: "A One-Time Signature (OTS) system can be used to sign one message securely, but cannot securely sign more than one" -> "A One-Time Signature (OTS) system can be used to sign one message securely, but will become insecure if more than one is signed with the same public/secret key pair." p.4 "When B is a byte and i is an integer, then B >> i denotes the logical right-shift operation." -> "When B is a byte and i is an integer, then B >> i denotes the logical right-shift operation by i positions." p.6/7: At first reading, I found r and q redundant. Only later in the document their different purpose became clear. p.8: The Winternitz coefficient w is a member of the set {1,2,4,8}. Later in the spec, only terms of the form 2^w-1 become relevant. I understand that this probably the notation from the paper, but it seems a bit weird to consider constant w-th powers of 2, instead of integer constants directly. One could (slightly) simplify this by letting w be a member of the set {1,3,15,255} and later work with w instead of 2^w-1. One could then easily even consider other values for w. Also {1,4,16,256} would appear a bit more natural. p.15: "size of the hash function" -> "output length of the hash function" p.16, Algorithm 5: Is step 3 of this algorithm really necessary? If yes, an explaining remark would be helpful. It seems to me that this instruction is not necessary. p.18/19: Algorithm 6a, step 3: "compute the candidate the LMS root value Tc ... using algorithm 6b" The caption of Algorithm 6b uses a different wording: "compute an LMS Public Key Candidate". I suggest to replace in algorithm 6a, step 3: "compute the candidate the LMS root value Tc ... using algorithm 6b" -> "compute the candidate the LMS Public Key Candidate Tc ... using algorithm 6b" to unify notation and improve clarity. p.20: A developer may wonder for which choices of N it should implement the scheme from Section 5, and when the scheme from Section 6 becomes more reasonable. I understand that this is difficult to say in general, but at least some recommendations or hints, e.g. in form of table with some example calculations of key size, computational difficulty of signing, etc., would clearly be helpful to assist this decision. p.31/32: I got the impression that the root of the problem does not become very clear here. The draft discusses volatile memory etc., but I think that more generally *any* race condition that can result in re-use of individual OTS keys is problematic. One could also point out that this makes it difficult to parallelize the generation of signatures, in particular with modern multi-core operating CPUs in mind. This could be explained more clearly here. Typos: p.2: "moderatley" p.2: "incorporate" -> "incorporated" p.11: "priva key" -> "private key" On 30/10/2017 10:54, Paterson, Kenny wrote: > Thanks Tibor, that would be great. > > On 30/10/2017 08:17, "Crypto-panel on behalf of Tibor Jager" > wrote: > >> Hi Alexey and Kenny, >> >> I can have a look at this, too. >> >> Cheers, >> Tibor >> >> On 29/10/2017 14:32, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>> Dear Crypto Panel, >>> >>> CFRG Chairs would like to request review of >>> before >>> forwarding it to IRSG for final review and approval. >>> >>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Kenny and Alexey >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Crypto-panel mailing list >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > From nobody Tue Nov 28 06:03:02 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1339F12711E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:03:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEswDpWlQC8u for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:02:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF93127011 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:02:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1511877774; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=YbSFYxKLoPV934EtkE79rze9e24WRtPGNEBauFKGOuM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=C7Yv/TbrT/jZUfWYrhD10Xr09wwyynxsloAN4lc6waWTOotmthBmbfs+n/16Sd8B47g1Aa qQW6jwvg2OS3rdBeFizG2laXPykDZOzEjkle/B+yUogQ6/uXqPz1MslaI8JfdK1idvN1sj OVk/egGSVeJLQrdtyulSitjmTuztF+c=; Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:02:54 +0000 From: Alexey Melnikov To: crypto-panel@irtf.org Cc: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org, Tim Polk , Nancy Cam-Winget Message-ID: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:02:38 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:03:01 -0000 Dear Crypto Panel, SAAG=92s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the=20 CURDLE WG). Can we have some volunteer(s) please? The draft Abstract is: This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) regulations for use within China. Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 and SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile "OSCCA-SM234". Thank you, Alexey From nobody Tue Nov 28 07:22:00 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DA51242EA for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.698 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xc9Cr9aBsOcy for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B3F120727 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u184so233963qkd.6 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=16yeJPSN3Z/PWF3xhH1aqyA0fwuzL+OTDGHe7mJK4zg=; b=S5kgEtt7++II8M4SMswqLwakXkgWZK1Oqtp7eRe4rQOIzyQHiFttF7PKGalJJxzAb5 g/NMEIqI6m3CaxuyCV2u/11eGAywkBHA7M4Fv48CtcYaW6AGVNdWRQ7NiRLB3QAmMgmq haSC/26MX3ZsFpVuFcR/8eG8rBBecJ9IVsJadclzXO9j1owUGmsGf1vWvH1MlX416aE7 oBmZ9AUF6i3/Ybaj5uyLlhEiU2GmV0Gu+xcuExI7JJXgZUH+CEhlaYEP9GXntLRJ2Oxs 3QJ9ScrUwCD5+QBHcg/rcmB//zDPeKFblyy+p5CdweMPzefyaHUlkiXs4xyKfl4vh4xe OJHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=16yeJPSN3Z/PWF3xhH1aqyA0fwuzL+OTDGHe7mJK4zg=; b=C219G6PGpmUZLxPeS8cBWA+iKT39SVqwssMWJ5Udu5Y2ylwPzaJKiXwdgqnw588fCh lpG/RCUS+RTIkIIgoP/jF+Se2X7/RLiGYHL95xlnUdOgZ9S0bslow+qh3ZK1F37hv3BR 5eFBaEXZRN2TDzNGdwU/00zDYKVEFdWSipnvgHCH8YDzWZqLcQkvUMShKDgfrqRwGPOK GDw44nFzgLV4iZpZS6BWnULdUcvFR7BjgaKdHhza1a6jBoukxqruCMOdBNlhcmivzN5h jjRrs+IirlyJzS3dnvpGdU21I75qIHTgNzJEpnNIeCqC3JE7igPXxTx442F3PVxr+a+r atnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5DSyh8ok3KYkpF8/e7zR4EGr81D+LHcSWdFKw+UmU93lT8c5h2 vxjBEkoMDA09s5JT06p6NpinXKJnYMPDmw8eAKo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaXGTcrZIfKVniO/OrvEAIJuLfYDAqeC57ctzOiviqqtxTruQcLZauvlmCW2NpaLWUcL7Lp/9GaV/HjKQBlY2o= X-Received: by 10.55.192.19 with SMTP id o19mr40201658qki.148.1511882512306; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.139 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:21:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:21:51 +0300 Message-ID: To: Alexey Melnikov Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, Nancy Cam-Winget , draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org, Tim Polk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149abfa169dfc055f0c94ab" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:21:59 -0000 --001a1149abfa169dfc055f0c94ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Alexey, I'll be happy to do this. Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? Best regards, Stanislav 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov : > Dear Crypto Panel, > > SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of > > before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the > CURDLE WG). > > Can we have some volunteer(s) please? > > The draft Abstract is: > > This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner > with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) > regulations for use within China. > > Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 and > SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile > "OSCCA-SM234". > > > Thank you, > Alexey > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > --001a1149abfa169dfc055f0c94ab Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do th= is.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20= th of December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov <= span dir=3D"ltr"><alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the CUR= DLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration)<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, = SM3 and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profi= le
=C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel

--001a1149abfa169dfc055f0c94ab-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 07:24:11 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64F512711E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:24:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o57Z3GaufRDB for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEAD1200FC for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:24:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1511882647; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=AtoYHygToUDixfo7DbhyjVkObA5oOATe75wNYNbQ7YE=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=MsnDNv8FXmaXZ9BMIKmcYfLnXWh3IVjaaxkbJwHvTsQTI09ciBDwXsmBYvFfgtollK/ZVj pF2UEoZ/zpcXoeeMOqWElWhQwmip81haz4/EY6d3HxSKomM3VDNkF5ZNo1s2D0ab8Neebc xgc/AhdMTN5Cw9sz91iz3ds6k9pwV6A=; Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:24:07 +0000 To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, Nancy Cam-Winget , draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org, Tim Polk References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> From: Alexey Melnikov Message-ID: <038fa9c7-e917-81fe-3b9c-ae25e7e27a71@isode.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:23:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------43DB3505D8FD7BBB88B21DC9" Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:24:10 -0000 --------------43DB3505D8FD7BBB88B21DC9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stanislav, On 28/11/2017 15:21, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev wrote: > Dear Alexey, > > I'll be happy to do this. > > Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? That would be great. Thank you! Best Regards, Alexey > Best regards, > > Stanislav > > > > 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov >: > > Dear Crypto Panel, > > SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of > > > before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up > in the CURDLE WG). > > Can we have some volunteer(s) please? > > The draft Abstract is: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compl= iant > manner > =C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administrat= ion) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of = SM2, > SM3 and > =C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP = profile > =C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234". > > > Thank you, > Alexey > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > --------------43DB3505D8FD7BBB88B21DC9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stanislav,

On 28/11/2017 15:21, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev wrote:
Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December?
That would be great. Thank you!

Best Regards,
Alexey

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/= >
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the CURDLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in = an compliant manner
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the u= sage of SM2, SM3 and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile
=C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel


--------------43DB3505D8FD7BBB88B21DC9-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 07:46:41 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D69127517 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:46:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3Do5RuSYYHP for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-hk2apc01on0054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.124.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E758E1242EA for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:46:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RbQR7ZLO/wD8AvWoD35vx11qqNRW2yajD8NzaH5LggA=; b=RhWyYmv6t/kgVdadoBv8ApZdPf0rOekasi5hLbqRm2M4GktslVtAbDc4j0rwj+m1WAqR4Fg2QpUURTYSI41CUQAqTAyKilHK1AtIfd9I92B2ULhFJ2qNjOUMIrHC1NFnJx7MAYtCBzIWm/0R/BX7QIcVjXbcvonxehJX8KBMqG8= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1052.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.211.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.260.4; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:46:27 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0260.007; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:46:27 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: Alexey Melnikov CC: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk , Nancy Cam-Winget Thread-Topic: Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 Thread-Index: AQHTaFGk9+I6QWZrjkm2FNPI8aRJY6Mp73UA Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:46:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> In-Reply-To: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [220.246.174.191] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1052; 6:cxdclAPRUN1FxIpKOzK2cJn3qpi5v/JAboz1Ec6oeAgGlT2wYRFCNsdTs7zdn948VfEPeH2Vi2keXxtrLbT3ThPqElPtolwho2WyXSSIyYBrS7iUrq3kRVuVU1djCY9iNLy14a1m5UAWZxjr13Hc8kAYkIOl6aTqxFzZoMdCtpcpbr6t3fD6vDJ8VieHf7Q8lAFfYqRbQTKeE1vItntbkqO90+tpbqtF6mZ82xwP6no/y7BVQVdlOYCp5IV0g55QJSfJdAHGmVYUOrGnVv2U73KtZuV1V+S//c1iywzoWq+79LmUB2pueSAYb/4Y1dj/k6i+Jr2eQGBRil39YTd7PvYESQ21jz/RV1qRNcC+vUw=; 5:E6W7p+OY6+AM1CKxADXx2/qlc4GJmAy5lHoOQtoE6WiCP1U/HYdYDVTAXJMLOdAGXgq30/utyKrRfbEURA0ZT3Xm/U2QI5jStZ7Vroaviu4FwXtQvmdcSG1qv3SgbFdjwP84B49VTubOihCTKZce/QTBpfDo1EfV1n9olfja68U=; 24:Sb1OgF/iM1ATiA/TwMYWnu1FhX6w6xd/w7d3nHLjBVaIL3ZWDpTx+G3v/wqvdeqPDk+8gbJkzxAF7jP9C13ZuURilwwEP90zCaMgiXuscxA=; 7:zgTV1Gf53etPTiHartLtfhn6bXI1srmewXXLY6POVICmllLGChYavYAMhCxH+/1Zdz+o9YRJewNjGQBHlu6UmrQiSVephEH5a9mJnjIoch6CocezQnbA2jVG6AqdSonEaipEjaaQJACnLuA/+WXGAvOBFSYZVXec3Tk7pHpD6GS3DOaf+ue4lXqumot0Aw9eaknu8+nC9tME6wopNrWElh7d4wnF0WkFj4gTwm2Y7vno+L4E/njKo/WAp+1oktmt x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: aad3cc11-dae0-4e89-a1d2-08d536773001 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603199); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1052: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231022)(6041248)(20161123555025)(2016111802025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-forefront-prvs: 0505147DDB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39830400002)(24454002)(189002)(45984002)(199003)(478600001)(101416001)(4326008)(66066001)(6486002)(229853002)(413944005)(6506006)(14454004)(33656002)(189998001)(6436002)(5250100002)(106356001)(105586002)(3280700002)(81166006)(97736004)(3660700001)(230783001)(7736002)(8676002)(81156014)(99286004)(8656006)(3846002)(6916009)(2950100002)(6246003)(6116002)(102836003)(6306002)(236005)(54896002)(36756003)(25786009)(5660300001)(6512007)(2900100001)(2906002)(53936002)(86362001)(68736007)(54906003)(8936002)(53546010)(316002)(606006)(83716003)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(82746002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BD948478D46F42D0A33F8C5C5AB247CDribosecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aad3cc11-dae0-4e89-a1d2-08d536773001 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Nov 2017 15:46:27.5027 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1052 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:46:39 -0000 --_000_BD948478D46F42D0A33F8C5C5AB247CDribosecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBBbGV4ZXksDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSB2ZXJ5IG11Y2ggZm9yIGhlbHBpbmcgdXMgcmVxdWVz dCB0aGUgcmV2aWV3cy4gV2UgbG9vayBmb3J3YXJkIGltcHJvdmluZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYWNjb3Jk aW5nIHRvIGZlZWRiYWNrIQ0KDQpLaW5kIHJlZ2FyZHMsDQpSb24NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KDQpSb25hbGQgVHNlDQpSaWJvc2UgSW5jLg0KDQpPbiBO b3YgMjgsIDIwMTcsIGF0IDEwOjAyIFBNLCBBbGV4ZXkgTWVsbmlrb3YgPGFsZXhleS5tZWxuaWtv dkBpc29kZS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmFsZXhleS5tZWxuaWtvdkBpc29kZS5jb20+PiB3cm90ZToNCg0K RGVhciBDcnlwdG8gUGFuZWwsDQoNClNBQUfigJlzIFNFQ0RJU1BBVENIIGNoYWlycyBoYXZlIHJl cXVlc3RlZCByZXZpZXcgb2YNCjxodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFm dC1yaWJvc2Utb3BlbnBncC1vc2NjYS8+DQpiZWZvcmUgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IGZhdGUgd2lsbCBi ZSBkZWNpZGVkIChpdCBpcyBsaWtlbHkgdG8gZW5kIHVwIGluIHRoZSBDVVJETEUgV0cpLg0KDQpD YW4gd2UgaGF2ZSBzb21lIHZvbHVudGVlcihzKSBwbGVhc2U/DQoNClRoZSBkcmFmdCBBYnN0cmFj dCBpczoNCg0KICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGVuYWJsZXMgT3BlblBHUCAoUkZDNDg4MCkgdXNhZ2Ug aW4gYW4gY29tcGxpYW50IG1hbm5lcg0KICB3aXRoIE9TQ0NBIChPZmZpY2Ugb2YgU3RhdGUgQ29t bWVyY2lhbCBDaXBoZXIgQWRtaW5pc3RyYXRpb24pDQogIHJlZ3VsYXRpb25zIGZvciB1c2Ugd2l0 aGluIENoaW5hLg0KDQogIFNwZWNpZmljYWxseSwgaXQgZXh0ZW5kcyBPcGVuUEdQIHRvIHN1cHBv cnQgdGhlIHVzYWdlIG9mIFNNMiwgU00zIGFuZA0KICBTTTQgYWxnb3JpdGhtcywgYW5kIHByb3Zp ZGVzIHRoZSBPU0NDQS1jb21wbGlhbnQgT3BlblBHUCBwcm9maWxlDQogICJPU0NDQS1TTTIzNCIu DQoNCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91LA0KQWxleGV5DQoNCg== --_000_BD948478D46F42D0A33F8C5C5AB247CDribosecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgbGluZS1icmVhazogYWZ0 ZXItd2hpdGUtc3BhY2U7IiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCkRlYXIgQWxleGV5LA0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj48 YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+VGhhbmsgeW91IHZlcnkgbXVjaCBm b3IgaGVscGluZyB1cyByZXF1ZXN0IHRoZSByZXZpZXdzLiBXZSBsb29rIGZvcndhcmQgaW1wcm92 aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gZmVlZGJhY2shPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIi PjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj5LaW5kIHJlZ2FyZHMsPC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPlJvbjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6 IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgbGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6IG5vcm1hbDsgb3JwaGFuczogYXV0bzsgdGV4 dC1hbGlnbjogc3RhcnQ7IHRleHQtaW5kZW50OiAwcHg7IHRleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOiBub25lOyB3 aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTogbm9ybWFsOyB3aWRvd3M6IGF1dG87IHdvcmQtc3BhY2luZzogMHB4OyAtd2Vi a2l0LXRleHQtc3Ryb2tlLXdpZHRoOiAwcHg7IHdvcmQtd3JhcDogYnJlYWstd29yZDsgLXdlYmtp dC1uYnNwLW1vZGU6IHNwYWNlOyAtd2Via2l0LWxpbmUtYnJlYWs6IGFmdGVyLXdoaXRlLXNwYWNl OyIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPGJyIGNs YXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KUm9uYWxkIFRzZTxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NClJpYm9zZSBJ bmMuPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 YmxvY2txdW90ZSB0eXBlPSJjaXRlIiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+T24gTm92IDI4 LCAyMDE3LCBhdCAxMDowMiBQTSwgQWxleGV5IE1lbG5pa292ICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86 YWxleGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlzb2RlLmNvbSIgY2xhc3M9IiI+YWxleGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlzb2Rl LmNvbTwvYT4mZ3Q7IHdyb3RlOjwvZGl2Pg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1pbnRlcmNoYW5nZS1u ZXdsaW5lIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPkRlYXIgQ3J5cHRvIFBhbmVs LDxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NClNBQUfigJlzIFNFQ0RJU1BBVENIIGNoYWly cyBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZCByZXZpZXcgb2Y8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0 cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtcmlib3NlLW9wZW5wZ3Atb3NjY2Ev IiBjbGFzcz0iIj5odHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1yaWJvc2Ut b3BlbnBncC1vc2NjYS88L2E+Jmd0OzxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCmJlZm9yZSB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQg ZmF0ZSB3aWxsIGJlIGRlY2lkZWQgKGl0IGlzIGxpa2VseSB0byBlbmQgdXAgaW4gdGhlIENVUkRM RSBXRykuPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KQ2FuIHdlIGhhdmUgc29tZSB2b2x1 bnRlZXIocykgcGxlYXNlPzxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NClRoZSBkcmFmdCBB YnN0cmFjdCBpczo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDtUaGlz IGRvY3VtZW50IGVuYWJsZXMgT3BlblBHUCAoUkZDNDg4MCkgdXNhZ2UgaW4gYW4gY29tcGxpYW50 IG1hbm5lcjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwO3dpdGggT1NDQ0EgKE9mZmljZSBvZiBT dGF0ZSBDb21tZXJjaWFsIENpcGhlciBBZG1pbmlzdHJhdGlvbik8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJz cDsmbmJzcDtyZWd1bGF0aW9ucyBmb3IgdXNlIHdpdGhpbiBDaGluYS48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8 YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDtTcGVjaWZpY2FsbHksIGl0IGV4dGVuZHMgT3BlblBH UCB0byBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSB1c2FnZSBvZiBTTTIsIFNNMyBhbmQ8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJz cDsmbmJzcDtTTTQgYWxnb3JpdGhtcywgYW5kIHByb3ZpZGVzIHRoZSBPU0NDQS1jb21wbGlhbnQg T3BlblBHUCBwcm9maWxlPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7JnF1b3Q7T1NDQ0EtU00y MzQmcXVvdDsuPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KVGhh bmsgeW91LDxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCkFsZXhleTxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0K PC9odG1sPg0K --_000_BD948478D46F42D0A33F8C5C5AB247CDribosecom_-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 07:47:38 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4721242EA for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:47:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.919 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voIQt1YfPTPY for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:47:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-hk2apc01on0060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.124.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54123126BF3 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:47:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ilcJM+U7FfTC3NJOojFqUQmvLzqppVWlBQJ9k3upQ6w=; b=gczST6a39V6nnlIekbzLq/TT3P9B5/fiyGU9qrf1S3TMOTTdqcAK7iQz3YeL+MwxcBa9FDGixYIvh+NPgjte1vVzE49DK1nQNmqJqP45iEu5idxsU9ZzJ7JJj0Bmn5zN6Tt2ehQEnbP+ar5IRLnmsY6nFjQ9q6GRLMMUyW2Pyyc= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1052.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.211.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.260.4; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:47:31 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0260.007; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:47:31 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" CC: Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 Thread-Index: AQHTaFGk9+I6QWZrjkm2FNPI8aRJY6Mp6JeAgAAHKYA= Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:47:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [220.246.174.191] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1052; 6:lsS/V9oJlc1adf0FGyYWa5rD7/9/eJiL1uG8Kb3tnaPtYU231Q18S7xTo5ArnVv7OgSbvoT9Xh/QratlFXu4QqyOlrbmIBAmF5YixK2VH1JsjnauhwZ9yTDZiOjPNsc2yFlxlKHlq/mRYxX9TOFcckcyYipYH7OTmHPk1yR/g68DAgJfksK+aA6CQhvVPOWFDo2URjFR7d2wximi5OvT05i7iC4N7watYQUZil2Kp0oBFLs2nH3wJjMvDuublvTvoAZGz+aquuzfoy9MX4BfOgfFiWe4nH1lYdRqVRDZuA5y+ZoRwDdVZ7YtLrkAECTFSZOZqKVs84wVvPe95SQ0e3N4QL2AoXbM8/oiDxzLq+E=; 5:pexmHpAT5/b/nilan0bS94GCFVI81ltethp9og4rLcGGMLh9za+JnHa/p5Mcs1IpXAT95N3JAyKW0t4TW/y13sSV3GmpBLSg5zwvZm+Vc7g4LOFiF5JELrjLc2cr5o1kX8kKgQVr1YNfYlJxe6duBPmfaWBh9+OWzWX/GM1k67E=; 24:kiNtaXTYysLNIbA/zQqNbeQBM3I7Jvy/3XK+P0PacBDi54yKhv0e07SmwUGe4leu40PC1aywt8I9vc9uEd+cjF3S1HjZbyR23+W0Uubevuo=; 7:kG03z+jmUgOen1za8zgn3lyTxUuHEgml0JC2vzoZXDFBLhxF4dRvAJVhWdE7m6Gw5zL+qhLQGmNeFORtUjr6eqs835esii/9LOn5rIGdNhVNHowT6AnLgvAnr4Rgb9XDhdz8rSeWtGd06QL0ufcaXm88oxPg8pQJ4+r+iodgQEgLPnpgUZaitT/Vxj/7yNZ0RxCfaBX3ibnE+dhgvsFEmWesaOmSrqBgI3/u6bgT4lf2CTsNT1t+++UqtH0uK2CR x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4479fd53-d0ec-48e4-cdef-08d5367755f0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603199); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1052: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231022)(6041248)(20161123555025)(2016111802025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-forefront-prvs: 0505147DDB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39830400002)(24454002)(189002)(45984002)(199003)(377424004)(478600001)(101416001)(4326008)(66066001)(6486002)(229853002)(413944005)(6506006)(14454004)(33656002)(966005)(189998001)(6436002)(5250100002)(106356001)(105586002)(3280700002)(81166006)(97736004)(3660700001)(230783001)(7736002)(8676002)(81156014)(4001150100001)(99286004)(8656006)(3846002)(6916009)(2950100002)(6246003)(6116002)(102836003)(6306002)(236005)(54896002)(36756003)(25786009)(5660300001)(6512007)(2900100001)(2906002)(53936002)(39060400002)(86362001)(68736007)(54906003)(8936002)(53546010)(316002)(606006)(83716003)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(1411001)(82746002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E699349743A64CB2866ED5AF55E1D168ribosecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4479fd53-d0ec-48e4-cdef-08d5367755f0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Nov 2017 15:47:31.1770 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1052 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:47:37 -0000 --_000_E699349743A64CB2866ED5AF55E1D168ribosecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBTdGFuaXNsYXYsDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSB2ZXJ5IG11Y2ggZm9yIHBlcmZvcm1pbmcgdGhl IHJldmlldy4gTG9vayBmb3J3YXJkIHRvIGl0IQ0KDQpLaW5kIHJlZ2FyZHMsDQpSb24NCg0KX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KDQpSb25hbGQgVHNlDQpSaWJvc2Ug SW5jLg0KDQpPbiBOb3YgMjgsIDIwMTcsIGF0IDExOjIxIFBNLCBTdGFuaXNsYXYgVi4gU215c2hs eWFldiA8c215c2hzdkBnbWFpbC5jb208bWFpbHRvOnNteXNoc3ZAZ21haWwuY29tPj4gd3JvdGU6 DQoNCkRlYXIgQWxleGV5LA0KDQpJJ2xsIGJlIGhhcHB5IHRvIGRvIHRoaXMuDQoNCldpbGwgaXQg YmUgT0ssIGlmIEkgcHJvdmlkZSBhIHJldmlldyBieSB0aGUgMjB0aCBvZiBEZWNlbWJlcj8NCg0K DQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNClN0YW5pc2xhdg0KDQoNCjIwMTctMTEtMjggMTc6MDIgR01UKzAz OjAwIEFsZXhleSBNZWxuaWtvdiA8YWxleGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlzb2RlLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86YWxl eGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlzb2RlLmNvbT4+Og0KRGVhciBDcnlwdG8gUGFuZWwsDQoNClNBQUfigJlz IFNFQ0RJU1BBVENIIGNoYWlycyBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZCByZXZpZXcgb2YNCjxodHRwczovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1yaWJvc2Utb3BlbnBncC1vc2NjYS8+DQpiZWZv cmUgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IGZhdGUgd2lsbCBiZSBkZWNpZGVkIChpdCBpcyBsaWtlbHkgdG8gZW5k IHVwIGluIHRoZSBDVVJETEUgV0cpLg0KDQpDYW4gd2UgaGF2ZSBzb21lIHZvbHVudGVlcihzKSBw bGVhc2U/DQoNClRoZSBkcmFmdCBBYnN0cmFjdCBpczoNCg0KICAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBlbmFi bGVzIE9wZW5QR1AgKFJGQzQ4ODApIHVzYWdlIGluIGFuIGNvbXBsaWFudCBtYW5uZXINCiAgIHdp dGggT1NDQ0EgKE9mZmljZSBvZiBTdGF0ZSBDb21tZXJjaWFsIENpcGhlciBBZG1pbmlzdHJhdGlv bikNCiAgIHJlZ3VsYXRpb25zIGZvciB1c2Ugd2l0aGluIENoaW5hLg0KDQogICBTcGVjaWZpY2Fs bHksIGl0IGV4dGVuZHMgT3BlblBHUCB0byBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSB1c2FnZSBvZiBTTTIsIFNNMyBh bmQNCiAgIFNNNCBhbGdvcml0aG1zLCBhbmQgcHJvdmlkZXMgdGhlIE9TQ0NBLWNvbXBsaWFudCBP cGVuUEdQIHByb2ZpbGUNCiAgICJPU0NDQS1TTTIzNCIuDQoNCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91LA0KQWxleGV5 DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpDcnlw dG8tcGFuZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOkNyeXB0 by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlydGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v Y3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsDQoNCg0K --_000_E699349743A64CB2866ED5AF55E1D168ribosecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <1C1DFF0E204FA049910CF964E2BD2484@apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgbGluZS1icmVhazogYWZ0 ZXItd2hpdGUtc3BhY2U7IiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCkRlYXIgU3RhbmlzbGF2LA0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0i Ij48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+VGhhbmsgeW91IHZlcnkgbXVj aCBmb3IgcGVyZm9ybWluZyB0aGUgcmV2aWV3LiBMb29rIGZvcndhcmQgdG8gaXQhPC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj5LaW5kIHJl Z2FyZHMsPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPlJvbjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj48YnIg Y2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAw KTsgbGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6IG5vcm1hbDsgb3JwaGFuczogYXV0bzsgdGV4dC1hbGlnbjogc3Rh cnQ7IHRleHQtaW5kZW50OiAwcHg7IHRleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOiBub25lOyB3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTog bm9ybWFsOyB3aWRvd3M6IGF1dG87IHdvcmQtc3BhY2luZzogMHB4OyAtd2Via2l0LXRleHQtc3Ry b2tlLXdpZHRoOiAwcHg7IHdvcmQtd3JhcDogYnJlYWstd29yZDsgLXdlYmtpdC1uYnNwLW1vZGU6 IHNwYWNlOyAtd2Via2l0LWxpbmUtYnJlYWs6IGFmdGVyLXdoaXRlLXNwYWNlOyIgY2xhc3M9IiI+ DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJy IGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KUm9uYWxkIFRzZTxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NClJpYm9zZSBJbmMuPGJyIGNsYXNz PSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSB0 eXBlPSJjaXRlIiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+T24gTm92IDI4LCAyMDE3LCBhdCAx MToyMSBQTSwgU3RhbmlzbGF2IFYuIFNteXNobHlhZXYgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpzbXlz aHN2QGdtYWlsLmNvbSIgY2xhc3M9IiI+c215c2hzdkBnbWFpbC5jb208L2E+Jmd0OyB3cm90ZTo8 L2Rpdj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtaW50ZXJjaGFuZ2UtbmV3bGluZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNz PSIiPg0KPGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciIgY2xhc3M9IiI+RGVhciBBbGV4ZXksDQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIi PjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj5JJ2xsIGJlIGhhcHB5IHRvIGRv IHRoaXMuPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSIiPjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBj bGFzcz0iIj5XaWxsIGl0IGJlIE9LLCBpZiBJIHByb3ZpZGUgYSByZXZpZXcgYnkgdGhlIDIwdGgg b2YgRGVjZW1iZXI/PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9leHRyYSI+PGJyIGNsZWFyPSJh bGwiIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX3NpZ25hdHVy ZSIgZGF0YS1zbWFydG1haWw9ImdtYWlsX3NpZ25hdHVyZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIiBjbGFz cz0iIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIiBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNz PSIiPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMWY0OTdkIiBjbGFzcz0iIj5CZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsPC9mb250Pjwv cD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSIiPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMWY0OTdkIiBjbGFzcz0iIj5TdGFuaXNsYXY8 L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iIj48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNz PSJnbWFpbF9xdW90ZSI+MjAxNy0xMS0yOCAxNzowMiBHTVQmIzQzOzAzOjAwIEFsZXhleSBNZWxu aWtvdiA8c3BhbiBkaXI9Imx0ciIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmFsZXhl eS5tZWxuaWtvdkBpc29kZS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIiBjbGFzcz0iIj5hbGV4ZXkubWVs bmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29tPC9hPiZndDs8L3NwYW4+OjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3Rl IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9xdW90ZSIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbjowIDAgMCAuOGV4O2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0 OjFweCAjY2NjIHNvbGlkO3BhZGRpbmctbGVmdDoxZXgiPg0KRGVhciBDcnlwdG8gUGFuZWwsPGJy IGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KU0FBR+KAmXMgU0VDRElTUEFUQ0ggY2hhaXJzIGhh dmUgcmVxdWVzdGVkIHJldmlldyBvZjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCiZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczov L2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1yaWJvc2Utb3BlbnBncC1vc2NjYS8iIHJl bD0ibm9yZWZlcnJlciIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiIGNsYXNzPSIiPmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNr ZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvPHdiciBjbGFzcz0iIj5kb2MvZHJhZnQtcmlib3NlLW9wZW5wZ3Atb3NjY2E8 d2JyIGNsYXNzPSIiPi88L2E+Jmd0OzxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCmJlZm9yZSB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQg ZmF0ZSB3aWxsIGJlIGRlY2lkZWQgKGl0IGlzIGxpa2VseSB0byBlbmQgdXAgaW4gdGhlIENVUkRM RSBXRykuPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KQ2FuIHdlIGhhdmUgc29tZSB2b2x1 bnRlZXIocykgcGxlYXNlPzxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NClRoZSBkcmFmdCBB YnN0cmFjdCBpczo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7VGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudCBlbmFibGVzIE9wZW5QR1AgKFJGQzQ4ODApIHVzYWdlIGluIGFuIGNvbXBsaWFu dCBtYW5uZXI8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7d2l0aCBPU0NDQSAoT2ZmaWNlIG9m IFN0YXRlIENvbW1lcmNpYWwgQ2lwaGVyIEFkbWluaXN0cmF0aW9uKTxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCiZu YnNwOyAmbmJzcDtyZWd1bGF0aW9ucyBmb3IgdXNlIHdpdGhpbiBDaGluYS48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+ DQo8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7U3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5LCBpdCBleHRlbmRzIE9w ZW5QR1AgdG8gc3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgdXNhZ2Ugb2YgU00yLCBTTTMgYW5kPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0K Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwO1NNNCBhbGdvcml0aG1zLCBhbmQgcHJvdmlkZXMgdGhlIE9TQ0NBLWNvbXBs aWFudCBPcGVuUEdQIHByb2ZpbGU8YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQombmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7JnF1b3Q7T1ND Q0EtU00yMzQmcXVvdDsuPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIi Pg0KVGhhbmsgeW91LDxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCkFsZXhleTxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjxiciBjbGFz cz0iIj4NCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzx3YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+X19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX188YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyIGNs YXNzPSIiPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOkNyeXB0by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJf YmxhbmsiIGNsYXNzPSIiPkNyeXB0by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8 YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL3d3dy5pcnRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NyeXB0by1wYW5l bCIgcmVsPSJub3JlZmVycmVyIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayIgY2xhc3M9IiI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cu aXJ0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9sPHdiciBjbGFzcz0iIj5pc3RpbmZvL2NyeXB0by1wYW5lbDwvYT48 YnIgY2xhc3M9IiI+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxiciBjbGFzcz0iIj4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGJyIGNsYXNzPSIiPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_E699349743A64CB2866ED5AF55E1D168ribosecom_-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 08:08:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358471271FD for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.698 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdJoBYdEdfxg for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CDD1270B4 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i130so453986qke.4 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fG35y4oSCca79BCAOqr0y3JGkQNsmUm0jU/WCrXk0/k=; b=OaBX8yylzbgThnv8LL0YhuV1a7h4LQ3Hwin9HZmVpH4sf6eWlBXp9ao+QwM0x88uq9 Jaw72rtX7lz4MKS7JRNp69btdvJdfhj0Chx+uw2yHc8DHWerl6EfRr88u8msnuOj5QIh k4W4ibNKHQP9uaBy1DWxk4y2oCZq4AiUIEj/W6Ao9auluYRJ6UDFtkfyTyMBd+OHy7q8 d6QG/3cJaG8r41gkbi3S8lFFLl8mbkgrANQIqDHbsK53SvyrBqZVcmwzPEW21dDL/3DO XrFMLcXdm2iQBL2SK3wASqEMDFdEDKUGQF4BiU+4+aPSko3VCmBdZyct38dtlxfSYv7R aojw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fG35y4oSCca79BCAOqr0y3JGkQNsmUm0jU/WCrXk0/k=; b=RFBVpEttwMKB6IXeq4a6vu5AYaAfY0fRHO1UmIDsIa2fLvEO4+p+PvBYkdvrBvn55e 9e8fKFG3m1Db/Q1IY5Tm69ypYiGDwNL36tMjgF+kUjKFPzA3wOpAcC7kPVNeUUlnTe9r MMKvGIgOMs8AGzqEXV5WpdGjdZVs4oOAhJJDugLYye0bDdTnwzGKaOzt4n93VZSJWHNC lwaMzM6kG8fibz39Glbx1xTdIWz0W/ys1hFk6RcEn4HRj9kPCt1HgJ3LWx3MIamY+ckJ bUoeG8gw01l0rIJCG/+hGPFRgX7iALMAIdWKEQao9/u7JGAoCns9ztfelBc+UNifa1SW vs6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7cLloKtxh44rzQUSkZlEBUPkCTYkV0zNGb6ysVBX3MjBIDbixl jIeG87ndDu4+isVJrHPSBnNR1g7yOwwzkx7PtL8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb7zW796oWlb8hLDVDfnKn8YtdAsIZ7/NpkCVru29VAQukwmSo47io6Fp6VRKHTyr7/ctzY98QgRFRVSau4ArM= X-Received: by 10.55.22.7 with SMTP id g7mr9332048qkh.82.1511885283259; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.139 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:08:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:08:02 +0300 Message-ID: To: Ronald Tse Cc: Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11474b6e3ff947055f0d3961" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:08:07 -0000 --001a11474b6e3ff947055f0d3961 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Ronald, Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with their analysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available (or could not be easily found via public resources). Also, it will be extremely important if you could provide some materials with design rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the I-D. Of course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made as a part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very important for making the review(s) as objective as possible. Best regards, Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D. Head of Information Security Department, CryptoPro LLC 2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse : > Dear Stanislav, > > Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it! > > Kind regards, > Ron > > _____________________________________ > > Ronald Tse > Ribose Inc. > > On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev > wrote: > > Dear Alexey, > > I'll be happy to do this. > > Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? > > Best regards, > > Stanislav > > > 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov : > >> Dear Crypto Panel, >> >> SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of >> >> before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the >> CURDLE WG). >> >> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >> >> The draft Abstract is: >> >> This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner >> with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) >> regulations for use within China. >> >> Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 and >> SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile >> "OSCCA-SM234". >> >> >> Thank you, >> Alexey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> > > > --001a11474b6e3ff947055f0d3961 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dea= r Ronald,

Since the document is dedicated to the a= lgorithms and elliptic curve parameters, it would be very helpful if you co= uld point at papers with their analysis in English, if some of them are not= publicly available (or could not be easily found via public resources). Al= so, it will be extremely important if you could provide some materials with= design rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the I-D.=C2= =A0

Of course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch i= s impossible to be made as a part of review, so all known results/attacks/n= otes on design rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be = very important for making the review(s) as objective as possible.

Best regards,
Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D.
Head of Information Security Department,
CryptoPro LLC



2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com= >:
Dear Stanislav,

Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:=

Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov <alexey.m= elnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the CUR= DLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration)<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, = SM3 and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profi= le
=C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel



--001a11474b6e3ff947055f0d3961-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 08:28:52 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1CA127F0E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:28:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.919 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Eccj4hwlHVM for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:28:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sg2apc01on0046.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.125.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79BBA127B73 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:28:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=FlPdOr315/A5haxIDnoWTPL8SWdR2xfZWdTjWjCGRg4=; b=xMNqPTZWnYDNOdlgpqPGhzdvXcS91oBBbDOnwnLpop7tAzxwsXed2DBErESealgLPC2cOT/6rt1/OsItken4rs/JilrFqhbSvsO+tgGwBXtueIo/D3A4f8edbVuZb/QrdX+W8LvejAxlDlJTnKPG5odQe1v/R9e8OumF4l37p/o= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.260.4; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:28:40 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0260.007; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:28:40 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" CC: Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 Thread-Index: AQHTaFGk9+I6QWZrjkm2FNPI8aRJY6Mp6JeAgAAHKYCAAAW+AIAABcIA Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:28:39 +0000 Message-ID: <087A0995-B344-4CBE-B300-D2431F1E5552@ribose.com> References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [220.246.174.191] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1050; 6:/yh8kq1ti53fYNGN6xsyn+7+HkVqihzeOkjxx05kZ2IM2s+v3daZDokY9mtBkTOhsrYsHFylyC90nsW8markal4+dC5obRhygkauYdttivahfgHdc90tYkSKM8a1T/EcBYzFfMKarasN5Q29eHJ9IL9hZwGUGf+6eeQ4jdz2V4CUm3zH2RjgrBsA8f002pXR/nLsbnIGLKLES+9PVbXnl06hMWKQXia5yNrKuKqQQGyhXWoKRY3zzKN6YGzmdo3THPXOjtuR0pWpEWrlDWqNXP77upVHhg15N5rc596WE/LZiWeTyPBH8WzJ6eKBmcefe68BdaSmNMgWC7GlU7Qk5oe/ue09+bgLKHak1pTFnBk=; 5:aD+Tql++8Q4TkgPiDn9r1Ndr4eRfap25h14huy06DhFAzK3l9fOmxOsZU6XyrJPbBLttz9yfmv7w5yBYXWcO6RMmJThE4IWYIcO68adzUYQi2bTK/ygxQRi9UwCJ2K1xqLfH2oHi3DKXL5VpCniBdcsx5PLjybGmR3jiWueFqrQ=; 24:yzXq6XSGM7KwSCDJyDIctO65Q1yjseK7gPFgY9Lcs5oZNX36b9ZXgeVGD93moe2T/Hm60sy0B5nvwMDeM+MdM4ya63vLlGNqJ8yMoXP7S3g=; 7:gET5HK0xM/pcWo9yI5zKzcjE8AX1EyhTPDl4TaKGNHyOSj4YtePrkIJ1ZqRCr1TI2zy5F7e4Tbz6FGBnsIRti4BrvLblZP39H43BAwFXBf+lHBwkq6KdLoM8kIfp70agrYZsRplIDHQe6q5ZmngntVjhDbbteBvVy0sOy9AS0xWqj8MuKP02d+z4u44Gng0yxec/CYDXY6GvapydbYK32pbzzQCAhCoVqGvoKKk6y7ogY6dgqFU0oIqnrrdawSkp x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8edde1ac-d7f5-4bdc-1a14-08d5367d1568 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603258)(49563074); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1050; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1050: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231022)(93006095)(93001095)(6041248)(20161123560025)(2016111802025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1050; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1050; x-forefront-prvs: 0505147DDB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(366004)(39830400002)(199003)(129404003)(377424004)(24454002)(45984002)(189002)(25786009)(4001150100001)(82746002)(5250100002)(86362001)(36756003)(4326008)(966005)(413944005)(68736007)(93886005)(54906003)(105586002)(53936002)(8656006)(230783001)(8676002)(39060400002)(606006)(81156014)(6246003)(81166006)(8936002)(83716003)(53546010)(2900100001)(99286004)(97736004)(6512007)(189998001)(1411001)(76176999)(50986999)(54896002)(6306002)(14454004)(6436002)(54356999)(2906002)(6506006)(6486002)(99936001)(236005)(102836003)(3846002)(5660300001)(229853002)(6116002)(106356001)(3660700001)(66066001)(101416001)(478600001)(316002)(3280700002)(33656002)(2950100002)(6916009)(7736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1050; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_556E44E8-4687-4DFC-9DE9-4F143B92CBAD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8edde1ac-d7f5-4bdc-1a14-08d5367d1568 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Nov 2017 16:28:39.9030 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1050 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:28:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_556E44E8-4687-4DFC-9DE9-4F143B92CBAD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_376CE1D6-ACC0-408D-B400-35F71A1AA0EA" --Apple-Mail=_376CE1D6-ACC0-408D-B400-35F71A1AA0EA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Dear Stanislav, You are absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, SM3 and SM4 = (they are referred to within this draft, too): SM2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02 SM3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02 SM4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-05 The SM3 and SM4 drafts contain both a design rationale and a = cryptanalysis section. Specifically, the cryptanalysis section contain = bibliography references with links to research publications of the = latest cryptanalysis results (English + Chinese). Most of these results = are freely available in English (Google Scholar). As a matter of fact, we are currently updating the SM2 draft to provide = the same level of detail as the other two. I=E2=80=99d just like to clarify that the current review is purely on = the OpenPGP side of things. That said, we have previously requested a = CFRG review of the SM4 draft too, so if you have some time to review = that draft, it would be even more awesome :-) Hope this helps! Kind regards, Ron _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc. > On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = wrote: >=20 > Dear Ronald, >=20 > Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve = parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with = their analysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available = (or could not be easily found via public resources). Also, it will be = extremely important if you could provide some materials with design = rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the I-D. >=20 > Of course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made = as a part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design = rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very = important for making the review(s) as objective as possible. >=20 > Best regards, > Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D. > Head of Information Security Department, > CryptoPro LLC >=20 >=20 >=20 > 2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse >: > Dear Stanislav, >=20 > Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it! >=20 > Kind regards, > Ron >=20 > _____________________________________ >=20 > Ronald Tse > Ribose Inc. >=20 >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = > wrote: >>=20 >> Dear Alexey, >>=20 >> I'll be happy to do this. >>=20 >> Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? >>=20 >> Best regards, >>=20 >> Stanislav >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov >: >> Dear Crypto Panel, >>=20 >> SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of >> > >> before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in = the CURDLE WG). >>=20 >> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >>=20 >> The draft Abstract is: >>=20 >> This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner >> with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) >> regulations for use within China. >>=20 >> Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 = and >> SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile >> "OSCCA-SM234". >>=20 >>=20 >> Thank you, >> Alexey >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel = >>=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_376CE1D6-ACC0-408D-B400-35F71A1AA0EA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Dear = Stanislav,

You are = absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, SM3 and SM4 (they are = referred to within this draft, too):

SM2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02
SM3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02
SM4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-05<= div class=3D"">
The SM3 and SM4 = drafts contain both a design rationale and a cryptanalysis section. = Specifically, the cryptanalysis section contain bibliography references = with links to research publications of the latest cryptanalysis results = (English + Chinese). Most of these results are freely available in = English (Google Scholar).

As a matter of fact, we are currently updating the SM2 draft = to provide the same level of detail as the other two.

I=E2=80=99d just like to = clarify that the current review is purely on the OpenPGP side of things. = That said, we have previously requested a CFRG review of the SM4 draft = too, so if you have some time to review that draft, it would be even = more awesome :-)

Hope this helps!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> = wrote:

Dear = Ronald,

Since = the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve = parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with = their analysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available = (or could not be easily found via public resources). Also, it will be = extremely important if you could provide some materials with design = rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the = I-D. 

Of = course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made as a = part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design = rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very = important for making the review(s) as objective as possible.

Best = regards,
Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D.
Head of Information Security Department,
CryptoPro LLC



2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 = Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>:
Dear Stanislav,

Thank you very much for performing the review. Look = forward to it!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of = December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov = <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the = CURDLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

   This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an = compliant manner
   with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher = Administration)
   regulations for use within China.

   Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of = SM2, SM3 and
   SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP = profile
   "OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel




= --Apple-Mail=_376CE1D6-ACC0-408D-B400-35F71A1AA0EA-- --Apple-Mail=_556E44E8-4687-4DFC-9DE9-4F143B92CBAD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEVqvqh2I10lDVb5euPK6eITJcoCwFAlodjrYACgkQPK6eITJc oCx5ug/9FWSjQn4KA1qkwBiiqRDCf4qCUuiT8ycgUcl8Rwd7JAFyQR5SGeIn/Kwp pJRhGnHAcb1enDh1lR8LwCvFjadEvCxTEQH5SCiRl8TneN7MZXP8UGQLUecwGXbr alWzwFcsXumkH1rHZQw6vWI0ZKjwl6OwTm9UCu/bD9NI208WTI3MFFjcGieCZZBd fkVD4isiaxsXAn2xRx7sZ6Dcp1qbqiBNjRDOYX+0Ix3U8Kc+ulEmp7em+Kjx1xWT zyVfFMw/O3QJp+C7am7WQbO7azLU+u/e0jU65HcpXTkw4FNIQGJXTGVpWOwejs0w 0UGSWGIznNdkxbsf/UJTTaG/FrY7Rzt/F6qp5KBa7Vhz2uvc4fYz+aI0Kq32RizN zkfqQiwg9zZqQ9zsJIuXFwpFAMCOx/dmP4fn/8UMdqLsy8TiqfIKiuhqZWm7VusJ K43jw261674qIGyHQ82TpeOkP0FqHaqGfjbPR3RIY5dTGoJElG5ldLQCfiPNGlu3 pfPnygHV2WjWDcSJiGx9o9R3Vh8aTlCeGZZV7qTQmU2PscAM7FdBWETp4eoilfRX Ki2XIW803JQHpdI3tRmABoakej8Cu9eamCcahnSln9CLcZUGrezuCJaMjkhJnUxO yzMiuoHNCgdrr8bNfDSUpVNjrTiGwrlDXhVfQwGBwDutlTOfukA= =w7Tt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_556E44E8-4687-4DFC-9DE9-4F143B92CBAD-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 08:41:15 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E51127F0E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9qIzzeb7mwu for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95AE0126CB6 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31CB300596 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:41:11 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CTWXP7ZNa55a for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:41:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from new-host-8.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9649D30042C; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:41:10 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Russ Housley In-Reply-To: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:42:09 -0500 Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, Tim Polk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <687430DD-E4F1-4742-A780-F32FECB32E3E@vigilsec.com> References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> To: Alexey Melnikov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:41:14 -0000 Sorry, but I cannot do this one. Russ > On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:02 AM, Alexey Melnikov = wrote: >=20 > Dear Crypto Panel, >=20 > SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of > > before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in = the CURDLE WG). >=20 > Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >=20 > The draft Abstract is: >=20 > This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner > with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) > regulations for use within China. >=20 > Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 = and > SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile > "OSCCA-SM234". >=20 >=20 > Thank you, > Alexey >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel From nobody Tue Nov 28 09:19:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433EB128D86 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:19:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKn1m9hHQ1cd for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com (mail-yb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E69128BB6 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id t127so237085ybf.9 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+7or1BvYjBKE6sVvsyl+jOl+QCXiy5BZGEGZW46WgF8=; b=fYDvZTLn75peIyfVSBOH3guNXb0S3ZyuNTTNNECjnG98YWu20A6FaenQurzlOmaC1B CAYO0nItXAEQxXbWkbBm0TeJBdBHinZa3vitTz1e2VvUXvJr1wghgTIR8hVcj5hD74Zh enJHYLps9aPRxltLUcp7Im81RcjMt8wMAJXKX3oNdnXxye++UYZkg/fWSafdLz1cR6Px gEuSgj6yLgdKzoSghcdkW7jBTUICSsjzGYHw7ftVlYxsRrVCGkPsgamYoqJUgtjYZFAE JU89VMxKxglY3TZOf36lqVFTfDTZ2OeppUSHETU4u7Quod4hyxxUZpkNnuQu4mfeehHl Bmug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+7or1BvYjBKE6sVvsyl+jOl+QCXiy5BZGEGZW46WgF8=; b=Xn8w239Iv1sJcakjbsRf71zAXCPJxoGgZ2dfW16W/5z7SMoa3mU/eSyaD1SUTAiP87 BzJOdwjbHYfzYTjO+zmxy+eZh2HeU0ygLgyZsZIkmaQrsf/Emtirg0rJFoSJvmOIrcEF CaFGUwn3lPPxQuuey1Kq6yIyS3Jwxi/5hGK3drwI9qK/oas6rDAkDF6O5IpNZy5UWLBe /wQOKMWLHtigSHLAsaJUvtaLt5xWGKtct7dHrDa6Z/c4pk9t8lQMMvCPOwN7i9XX0OMZ ZT3oBs/aJx2LfYfojWPp75XF/+rQr7lBBvrGUxJzKHohmBhmBxTHqgy45j+qjYnzcqCM T/9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6KZjN0c/TlrUAaP55JsZ8KrvsYD0PpfgtCTOPpPChmvXs6tC1i mcIP7Z80oRZcuobyGrcn42W6Fd8l00VRW5yBm5cnCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMam1ILoY2MQprzH7rzrcSexLKC0Jo9bE6YGGgRbheG/TDrDkhlfD6PfdgLLx9LE+qvh9yCZbP1SHca4uWdrKY4= X-Received: by 10.37.61.129 with SMTP id k123mr26977244yba.44.1511889540101; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.225.12 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:18:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> From: Bjoern Tackmann Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Cc: Alexey Melnikov , crypto-panel@irtf.org, Nancy Cam-Winget , Tim Polk , draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114bb17afa7d89055f0e3681" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:19:04 -0000 --001a114bb17afa7d89055f0e3681 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alexey, I'll also join here. I'll aim at a similar deadline as Stanislav, maybe a day or two later, if that's ok. Cheers, Bj=C3=B6rn On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev wrote: > Dear Alexey, > > I'll be happy to do this. > > Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? > > Best regards, > > Stanislav > > > 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov : > >> Dear Crypto Panel, >> >> SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of >> >> before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the >> CURDLE WG). >> >> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >> >> The draft Abstract is: >> >> This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner >> with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) >> regulations for use within China. >> >> Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 and >> SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile >> "OSCCA-SM234". >> >> >> Thank you, >> Alexey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > --001a114bb17afa7d89055f0e3681 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Alexey,

I'll also join here.

I'll aim at a similar deadline as Stanislav, mayb= e a day or two later, if that's ok.

Cheers,
Bj=C3=B6rn



On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:21 PM,= Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alexey,

= I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I = provide a review by the 20th of December?
<= br clear=3D"all">
<= p>Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov <= span dir=3D"ltr"><alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the CUR= DLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration)<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, = SM3 and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profi= le
=C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel


_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel


--001a114bb17afa7d89055f0e3681-- From nobody Tue Nov 28 18:14:05 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EC812783A for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:14:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJgCO33X4MG8 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:14:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-hk2apc01on0062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.124.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1539B1267BB for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:14:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=BmcG35u2qgIW3vfma4opRZ8djcby2rCNSzTZD/JXDz0=; b=TZHdJaKEKe51QmGFcLLDw/JLbOILx1kLWkS7oDNnVRbduIQuaauXVYYQ4XxFCLMzNM03LjtGxsB0gJv8Aw2Nt7vOUhvo4cmAD62JbU2g9NBnVb2YyNlJxBy3epiK057JMlAQBu5UI5/NNY79sIqdmqOIPvVLdYQ21uw4u8kRnOI= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1052.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.211.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.282.5; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:13:53 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0260.007; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:13:52 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: Bjoern Tackmann CC: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" , Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , Tim Polk , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 Thread-Index: AQHTaFGk9+I6QWZrjkm2FNPI8aRJY6Mp6JeAgAAguoCAAJVvAA== Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:13:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [118.140.121.70] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1052; 6:RH9LpukLdGZsMo4k0yFHF9OAmPL9kYoQAQFJA9FWXXCMzBPo+f4f5TfziS8VGTaJZCT/BwMIrZlQM/T5eISkCP2lhBzSOcIcaXHf2+bzgGqjAx+QSK7JWexftf/jEybM+H1FVfGYVzD/1P0iZP99p0g3Okyv5CkrwJ5STA35bm7ZXx842LhLoQSDMQqhP7tnXih/OQW6FzFSgZRwG5XcJ+D/YS4jmIU4Xuw/+pwF9uck4zJ6sDfP49oR89tNoHPKecV1TJBve0oWPzZcmW/MXoHeGCIk5yhntQzctysr8kfcPWXYko3gF3FNGbOD5WuoTx5KkoRj40JKAC/wH86gPVtcrsl/kj5jFY9wmah16ks=; 5:49JLjT9rNvQR1m4IcVcPwv3GmZhRB9ZcSKyg7a2MjjRW+Kl0uXaJWh9XQ+s9WY6VFH39vsiBlAFE0YRxfuzdyoHNZ3I5BlP38gcSU/gMZHkySljSBX2sCHxudqli6Tv3J+7cEO1vX/vdhKfvM6vvJvAIfy4Pbyc8aDirBGC5XCo=; 24:7QHaYCZKYKbKQk6J6y1zBqdphq1UyohmC17HdfpvVrHUeZTOL7KfYsutvjD5hh+w5zt4uYS38ktDL9sG3mWERkSjz6yCyLV4loAvtruCxV0=; 7:1vj55a75kGU94nLvxosPL2JZYIGI7zrCcLSRmfJOUF18BufrayZEoeYC9zC3+EOdy9ecXJxQfGPiwxHi/0gJP8kSvDrqQ38kR0jIlPuI1+E/s6ranB8Qtx87zSVy+y3X4qHnNmDDuJxcJB7+OZZA46RIwhYge9/O+mepGmk+fAyh+ylSZWabo6yVePzw5vbBczOqSwj25JlMcQZvPXdb8HSxV+BUbokiD0ZanVjDUmlqjGeYpK7FLqY2utiYRq+Y x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cd0add6d-09c6-41da-52b9-08d536ced64a x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603199)(49563074); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1052: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231022)(6041248)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(2016111802025)(20161123560025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; x-forefront-prvs: 05066DEDBB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39830400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(189002)(45984002)(199003)(24454002)(377424004)(99936001)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(7736002)(68736007)(54906003)(39060400002)(4001150100001)(97736004)(236005)(25786009)(2950100002)(6512007)(6436002)(53936002)(14454004)(6246003)(5660300001)(76176999)(316002)(54356999)(50986999)(54896002)(6306002)(101416001)(6916009)(3280700002)(2906002)(83716003)(3660700001)(36756003)(478600001)(6506006)(229853002)(5250100002)(82746002)(966005)(189998001)(3846002)(102836003)(33656002)(99286004)(6116002)(8936002)(66066001)(4326008)(86362001)(6486002)(230783001)(106356001)(8656006)(2900100001)(606006)(345774005)(53546010)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1052; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:3; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: NZ5k7yulfsLSE+DXaT2r4I4Yk9SpY9Ql58r44b+SHrMQCP1t9wKi37bklBhwJmKj8TydokVrcSCjnI0cbAgtiA== spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD3BB8E2-2BBB-4A22-88DA-F8DF5D31F82E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cd0add6d-09c6-41da-52b9-08d536ced64a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Nov 2017 02:13:52.6494 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1052 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:14:03 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_FD3BB8E2-2BBB-4A22-88DA-F8DF5D31F82E Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28C6F722-153E-4A15-A41B-064B5A076D84" --Apple-Mail=_28C6F722-153E-4A15-A41B-064B5A076D84 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Bjoern, Thank you very much =E2=80=94 your help is much appreciated! Kind regards, Ron _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc. +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ > On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:18 AM, Bjoern Tackmann = wrote: >=20 > Hi Alexey, >=20 > I'll also join here. >=20 > I'll aim at a similar deadline as Stanislav, maybe a day or two later, = if that's ok. >=20 > Cheers, > Bj=C3=B6rn >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = > wrote: > Dear Alexey, >=20 > I'll be happy to do this. >=20 > Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Stanislav >=20 >=20 >=20 > 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov >: > Dear Crypto Panel, >=20 > SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of > > > before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in = the CURDLE WG). >=20 > Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >=20 > The draft Abstract is: >=20 > This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner > with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) > regulations for use within China. >=20 > Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 = and > SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile > "OSCCA-SM234". >=20 >=20 > Thank you, > Alexey >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel = >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel = >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_28C6F722-153E-4A15-A41B-064B5A076D84 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi = Bjoern,

Thank you = very much =E2=80=94 your help is much appreciated!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+
This message may = contain confidential and/or privileged
information. =  If you are not the addressee or authorized to
receive = this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
disclose = or take any action based on this message or any
information = herein.  If you have received this message in
error, = please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and = delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+

On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:18 AM, Bjoern Tackmann <bjoern.tackmann@ieee.org> wrote:

Hi Alexey,

I'll also join here.

I'll aim at a similar = deadline as Stanislav, maybe a day or two later, if that's ok.

Cheers,
Bj=C3=B6rn



On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:21 PM, = Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by = the 20th of December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 = Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the = CURDLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

   This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an = compliant manner
   with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher = Administration)
   regulations for use within China.

   Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of = SM2, SM3 and
   SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP = profile
   "OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel


_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel



= --Apple-Mail=_28C6F722-153E-4A15-A41B-064B5A076D84-- --Apple-Mail=_FD3BB8E2-2BBB-4A22-88DA-F8DF5D31F82E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEVqvqh2I10lDVb5euPK6eITJcoCwFAloeF94ACgkQPK6eITJc oCzCww/8CAuCXLUrQxBnpxsAgqBdH0HD2y4DAPBIW4DpzJb4KE2vjRKZPbpujSao bW9PCLskk+n2w4ltlRm5CM3ptA0nkGvbUEJj+kSE2dxl2LmkWYZqh2CkyjlLebFH IbMCFqK4VR1/hWPHUQTebJh3m2ogBmUA2TF/kewrOBkFKxLNhJnHFU370iESITWS m3LSJY+eAIjAAQX7PraKTmcW9QF+nACdxXVAz+YFs4YzvXbxrW8eapSj9qux+RsK XhjUJa9yI/JSLF4rVEjir5fDYdZ2fpmM2SNSH4UahJ5DunCKiCcI13DEG4E0COyc kxJebFmcVxEyNtdakxvlXMg3+sbKAXlGXB4RBcwsZ/StQer1NX6vUTINTZ2+nlN1 ALm08VTHUBBrzEP9+rYdZDeYTGdmC3EUTXlv6+ydr/mdoWV0Cr8gzsNV6+u8/nev 3v/8bh79UGH670g4eqnXq7pHlbXLRt1kpK7vhGb7rUTiNYNQOu9w4FyoP822nUVy rUpKCXGssb0gak7Rr6CnNP3ZLfr1fKHEd6hmvw1DlL0XSSyiOOg/fqLF89hLe+lY EA1Pa786E6NXVnhewKEcMWPrVcYUY7U1vjLKGT0zhHhzlLzhC2ISq6/2Yl5kM43d dDSHv0nEJ0Rp1fmDCvzfEJk9U4bGTuRBnbGtOgHLoyvhBV9uvS8= =i+TU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_FD3BB8E2-2BBB-4A22-88DA-F8DF5D31F82E-- From nobody Wed Nov 29 05:23:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C6D126C3D for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKBTyBEduV88 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99301126B71 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w10so4224103qtb.10 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1vC67Q0dWDxmsMbXx3HTBAHHZ8ksrL9fRSTCetZOy2o=; b=JUq9fTjbVPBE9Y26HIfGd2yKkvoXcVjLllRqiSjDucMCRg4kQckOVrySOaUfUkJvBS rNEWly8Ag68kJE1Vl1fhiPs6vP8eGJ/Jn5ZIfwBvBuU+HR3A8ZrYIE/G8jHAXgnCPYZU kNesb6kUZHL4xixJJsocZCrEMZfERGjxLXAyWXw2GnLmB+MjZjmH4lZ6e3KurR7/jcQ3 FDEd4YBP3Rk3QKNg2jHZWwWyQxTB4aLjPGd0O0mQ6Maj8r7HdN8lyweZSGV5zq6FjN/5 woXlvhnUEMt1gcgp+jLDwxex9VUZNlf04A8+izSYnBYB/wn3mhoUgv1nNiJZ52n4jL9T HnPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1vC67Q0dWDxmsMbXx3HTBAHHZ8ksrL9fRSTCetZOy2o=; b=XWTUokt1t6gxQ1k3GVjSJcMDMxqbl8gy43giIMoeAxWW4Hal8MRh0prT1Ih/da3MYz YiA1COJLsx1oBLOXPXlEurTRezq16Bxv0V6gM0ajAsjKlu2Vtsf5VnGCfo//9xU2AbzD KID5InTDrDxtX+DwJJ6RtGPX5jDyQE/AJ+a81LpIcfvH1zgxwSlneeMAFDaTgL1iyAS/ VT9Gb0+pYoJz9gMzs4NvJjalseTAYpUlZ5GO3k4JpTr5QUgj3jr1bw/yXR5CDAFylbPb FDwLI8+X0LHWfdl+vvZCqFl4lJuBQHUUNqXlkIVpnk3L7HJPjxIldvsIIGkiEs44QPWb ckvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4ZvBZFcLrGZTmw1WGLFemBmYGehmdMbs/Mi9jS4noVExLh9Jbv DFsTdqQPNyNeVHGfNPlMim0Guwxuo4NvEtilNi0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaTWYU5c6+wTzsrdPu0VBvsgg8s3X/z0JqM9L/2evt4ukOM6aHyWbgFtShNq1H01zRst3ngICI6lf+Gxny45Yc= X-Received: by 10.200.46.149 with SMTP id h21mr1509795qta.73.1511961820695; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.139 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:23:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <087A0995-B344-4CBE-B300-D2431F1E5552@ribose.com> References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> <087A0995-B344-4CBE-B300-D2431F1E5552@ribose.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:23:40 +0300 Message-ID: To: Ronald Tse Cc: Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c012763c9114055f1f0bbb" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:23:45 -0000 --001a11c012763c9114055f1f0bbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Ronald, Thank you very much for the links! The review is conducted by Crypto Review Panel, thus the analysis is being done more from the cryptographic perspective, and the current state of the analysis of the proposed mechanisms is taken into account. Best regards, Stanislav 2017-11-28 19:28 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse : > Dear Stanislav, > > You are absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, SM3 and SM4 > (they are referred to within this draft, too): > > SM2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02 > SM3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02 > SM4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-05 > > The SM3 and SM4 drafts contain both a design rationale and a cryptanalysi= s > section. Specifically, the cryptanalysis section contain bibliography > references with links to research publications of the latest cryptanalysi= s > results (English + Chinese). Most of these results are freely available i= n > English (Google Scholar). > > As a matter of fact, we are currently updating the SM2 draft to provide > the same level of detail as the other two. > > I=E2=80=99d just like to clarify that the current review is purely on the= OpenPGP > side of things. That said, we have previously requested a CFRG review of > the SM4 draft too, so if you have some time to review that draft, it woul= d > be even more awesome :-) > > Hope this helps! > > Kind regards, > Ron > > _____________________________________ > > Ronald Tse > Ribose Inc. > > On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev > wrote: > > Dear Ronald, > > Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve > parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with > their analysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available (or > could not be easily found via public resources). Also, it will be extreme= ly > important if you could provide some materials with design rationale of th= e > algorithms and parameters presented in the I-D. > > Of course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made as = a > part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design > rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very importan= t > for making the review(s) as objective as possible. > > Best regards, > Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D. > Head of Information Security Department, > CryptoPro LLC > > > > 2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse : > >> Dear Stanislav, >> >> Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it! >> >> Kind regards, >> Ron >> >> _____________________________________ >> >> Ronald Tse >> Ribose Inc. >> >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev >> wrote: >> >> Dear Alexey, >> >> I'll be happy to do this. >> >> Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Stanislav >> >> >> 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov : >> >>> Dear Crypto Panel, >>> >>> SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of >>> >>> before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the >>> CURDLE WG). >>> >>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >>> >>> The draft Abstract is: >>> >>> This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant manner >>> with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) >>> regulations for use within China. >>> >>> Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 an= d >>> SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile >>> "OSCCA-SM234". >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Alexey >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Crypto-panel mailing list >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >>> >> >> >> > > --001a11c012763c9114055f1f0bbb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Ronald,

Thank you= very much for the links!
The review is conducted by = Crypto Review Panel, thus the analysis is being done more from the cryptogr= aphic perspective, and the current state of the analysis of the proposed me= chanisms is taken into account.

Be= st regards,
Stanislav

<= /div>

2017-11-28 19:28 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse <tse@rib= ose.com>:
Dear Stanislav,

You are absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, SM3 and = SM4 (they are referred to within this draft, too):

SM2:=C2=A0https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02<= /a>

The SM3 and SM4 dr= afts contain both a design rationale and a cryptanalysis section. Specifica= lly, the cryptanalysis section contain bibliography references with links t= o research publications of the latest cryptanalysis results (English + Chin= ese). Most of these results are freely available in English (Google Scholar= ).

As a matter of fact, we are currently updating = the SM2 draft to provide the same level of detail as the other two.

I=E2=80=99d just like to clarify that the current review = is purely on the OpenPGP side of things. That said, we have previously requ= ested a CFRG review of the SM4 draft too, so if you have some time to revie= w that draft, it would be even more awesome :-)

Ho= pe this helps!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse<= br>Ribose Inc.

On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshly= aev <smyshsv@gmai= l.com> wrote:

Dear Ronald,

= Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve parame= ters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with their anal= ysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available (or could not b= e easily found via public resources). Also, it will be extremely important = if you could provide some materials with design rationale of the algorithms= and parameters presented in the I-D.=C2=A0

Of cou= rse, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made as a part o= f review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design rationale/results of= evaluation of curve parameters will be very important for making the revie= w(s) as objective as possible.

Best regards,<= /div>
Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D.
Head of Information Securit= y Department,
CryptoPro LLC



2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>:
Dear Stanislav,

Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:=

Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov <alexey.m= elnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the CUR= DLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration)<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0regulations for use within China.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, = SM3 and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profi= le
=C2=A0 =C2=A0"OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel




--001a11c012763c9114055f1f0bbb-- From nobody Wed Nov 29 10:24:41 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92D212896F for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:24:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPO_68KxAo3R for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:24:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-pu1apc01on0055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.126.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01754128961 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:24:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Ypx0rvJi6pSdOQqAf/zDwg23KIBHN601Y0wPfxwjdus=; b=qmWId0TsUwxn+luZOJgvyp45luO9u3M+4Zmy9pzGfhir7tbFyHETSECzzfTr1atcw0zWvKucEp7L6b88n55yaPsT1+yzc9FOASHg0bvt9mdDTNWfibsAHVj7fxSoChOiUrmPgE1QWT5MgKZKqhCiNE6jh0IQ5Bu2hvweVUzoJUQ= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1051.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.211.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.282.5; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:24:30 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::7990:d65:5722:9b79%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0282.006; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:24:30 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" CC: Alexey Melnikov , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , Nancy Cam-Winget , "draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca.authors@ietf.org" , Tim Polk Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 Thread-Index: AQHTaFGk9+I6QWZrjkm2FNPI8aRJY6Mp6JeAgAAHKYCAAAW+AIAABcIAgAFepwCAAFQLAA== Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:24:30 +0000 Message-ID: <23B65052-E3DC-4553-B729-BE1CE0899C62@ribose.com> References: <56db317a-07ad-0ad4-b1d1-31f12283115e@isode.com> <087A0995-B344-4CBE-B300-D2431F1E5552@ribose.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [220.246.174.191] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1051; 6:LcetK3d2GVpy4wzjLVXaIz3YYBKasdHx3Dnvx1LCId620nDwyjHjkWyw3A1o8AK9zLGnvb5oBXNq2vAzhEBoLXpRNvKGMUWaBwVcCVHAgzO/Ag/1nWmt8nQVFost7TG3fSJOsfxck6FSPpj5IMEj+2K+bN5ivYIHjUFE2K8OPngsHxFX0u/zJwQfBbnCwPgqVq6KtbdE1s0RAAxQbI1hlrWSJBx6TKT9PSIu0oPLkBnoXpBCsFkJA5u1nS4T01VrodboKw3yqoOZOSYyBxiO28g52N2SFTDTvRaUyBWmokh1hrexD0rqWNY3XhGm/TpIgHioZocriw3Q903T4lVLMA22QEt1UDlYu5fUcv7UoVE=; 5:nLWtJ2H3/rQ9/FzuMxI777VQF5xqcIZCApRvFVCmlY+11v+9Uytsrn50p0SENRddqzhIv7u+YbCrjM4cyHiR99QZK3HTUsgP8rOvGCChl7IuzVYDGiW2kytuFx4tZkBEHsqJ1JOnauCPtSR2fQl1o7/3CxUz6iXHn8xF6UIFcxY=; 24:yne1SBlX2gWbb5ELs1MNipMkYRGr4t5DqVDMwEf/rBbMkRZANeBApi2HBVSaKyec81JG4mz8KkXBxedrW8+spVmxO7KuVIiJ/skX02szmJU=; 7:oJ5RjM3lQg7RnU9LVuni8zxQ89+cxuv7xeQveBE73XMS9ZVo4hB337aJk4ctCRv/CGPq2dzShy6JfTdcrpjngyg2W0xE8GmxO5oyjbY0Y24UAl8O+l2q3U5s8/I0Ba29WHu/BR3TbcGp5arlfaz9VRT55fQaa0cFXsezVaEFcdUwIvYAybnjVTLnAzEtau5s0nzJ7akWP1iH7kEWvVLxFKLcuFmM9qlmW7NaY2blXeUkgnMwbukVgm1aCZR+JsGk x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3871337a-2b27-44aa-e7a6-08d537566e96 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603274)(49563074); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1051; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1051: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231022)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(2016111802025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148)(6043046)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1051; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1051; x-forefront-prvs: 05066DEDBB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(39830400002)(376002)(366004)(199003)(189002)(377424004)(24454002)(45984002)(129404003)(82746002)(2906002)(7736002)(8656006)(6436002)(4326008)(606006)(3846002)(8676002)(3280700002)(230783001)(101416001)(3660700001)(4001150100001)(36756003)(6116002)(86362001)(1411001)(6486002)(83716003)(54906003)(6506006)(81166006)(102836003)(81156014)(99286004)(5250100002)(316002)(345774005)(105586002)(106356001)(33656002)(53546010)(93886005)(2900100001)(6246003)(68736007)(5660300001)(97736004)(99936001)(478600001)(6916009)(236005)(53936002)(2950100002)(189998001)(966005)(25786009)(39060400002)(14454004)(229853002)(8936002)(6306002)(54896002)(6512007)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1051; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: pvf7rIhkzFwj/rJqYBmgl0crcVio8mzyuqD1r1IKXL3PZwBPi4VIpBHb1nRzwK1V8DijQ96glShnCdGKlMaUqg== spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4083E44F-562F-4538-89E7-24B6CE458600"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3871337a-2b27-44aa-e7a6-08d537566e96 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Nov 2017 18:24:30.2547 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1051 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca-01 X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:24:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4083E44F-562F-4538-89E7-24B6CE458600 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0638B6A6-64B7-4C39-ADB6-20BBF275E853" --Apple-Mail=_0638B6A6-64B7-4C39-ADB6-20BBF275E853 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Stanislav, Fully understand. Thank you again for your help! Ron _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc. +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ > On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = wrote: >=20 > Dear Ronald, >=20 > Thank you very much for the links! > The review is conducted by Crypto Review Panel, thus the analysis is = being done more from the cryptographic perspective, and the current = state of the analysis of the proposed mechanisms is taken into account. >=20 > Best regards, > Stanislav >=20 >=20 > 2017-11-28 19:28 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse >: > Dear Stanislav, >=20 > You are absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, SM3 and SM4 = (they are referred to within this draft, too): >=20 > SM2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02 = > SM3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02 = > SM4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-05 = >=20 > The SM3 and SM4 drafts contain both a design rationale and a = cryptanalysis section. Specifically, the cryptanalysis section contain = bibliography references with links to research publications of the = latest cryptanalysis results (English + Chinese). Most of these results = are freely available in English (Google Scholar). >=20 > As a matter of fact, we are currently updating the SM2 draft to = provide the same level of detail as the other two. >=20 > I=E2=80=99d just like to clarify that the current review is purely on = the OpenPGP side of things. That said, we have previously requested a = CFRG review of the SM4 draft too, so if you have some time to review = that draft, it would be even more awesome :-) >=20 > Hope this helps! >=20 > Kind regards, > Ron >=20 > _____________________________________ >=20 > Ronald Tse > Ribose Inc. >=20 >> On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = > wrote: >>=20 >> Dear Ronald, >>=20 >> Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and elliptic curve = parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point at papers with = their analysis in English, if some of them are not publicly available = (or could not be easily found via public resources). Also, it will be = extremely important if you could provide some materials with design = rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the I-D. >>=20 >> Of course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made = as a part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design = rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very = important for making the review(s) as objective as possible. >>=20 >> Best regards, >> Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D. >> Head of Information Security Department, >> CryptoPro LLC >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> 2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 Ronald Tse >: >> Dear Stanislav, >>=20 >> Thank you very much for performing the review. Look forward to it! >>=20 >> Kind regards, >> Ron >>=20 >> _____________________________________ >>=20 >> Ronald Tse >> Ribose Inc. >>=20 >>> On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = > wrote: >>>=20 >>> Dear Alexey, >>>=20 >>> I'll be happy to do this. >>>=20 >>> Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of December? >>>=20 >>> Best regards, >>>=20 >>> Stanislav >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> 2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov = >: >>> Dear Crypto Panel, >>>=20 >>> SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of >>> > >>> before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in = the CURDLE WG). >>>=20 >>> Can we have some volunteer(s) please? >>>=20 >>> The draft Abstract is: >>>=20 >>> This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an compliant = manner >>> with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher Administration) >>> regulations for use within China. >>>=20 >>> Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of SM2, SM3 = and >>> SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP profile >>> "OSCCA-SM234". >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Thank you, >>> Alexey >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Crypto-panel mailing list >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel = >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_0638B6A6-64B7-4C39-ADB6-20BBF275E853 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi = Stanislav,

Fully = understand. Thank you again for your help!

Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+
This message may = contain confidential and/or privileged
information. =  If you are not the addressee or authorized to
receive = this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
disclose = or take any action based on this message or any
information = herein.  If you have received this message in
error, = please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and = delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+

On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> = wrote:

Dear Ronald,

Thank you = very much for the links!
The review is = conducted by Crypto Review Panel, thus the analysis is being done more = from the cryptographic perspective, and the current state of the = analysis of the proposed mechanisms is taken into account.

Best regards,
Stanislav


2017-11-28 19:28 GMT+03:00 = Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>:
Dear Stanislav,

You are absolutely right. Here are the IETF drafts of SM2, = SM3 and SM4 (they are referred to within this draft, too):

SM2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-sm2-ecdsa-02
SM3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02
SM4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-05

The SM3 and SM4 drafts contain both a = design rationale and a cryptanalysis section. Specifically, the = cryptanalysis section contain bibliography references with links to = research publications of the latest cryptanalysis results (English + = Chinese). Most of these results are freely available in English (Google = Scholar).

As a = matter of fact, we are currently updating the SM2 draft to provide the = same level of detail as the other two.

I=E2=80=99d just like to clarify that = the current review is purely on the OpenPGP side of things. That said, = we have previously requested a CFRG review of the SM4 draft too, so if = you have some time to review that draft, it would be even more awesome = :-)

Hope this = helps!

Kind = regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov = 29, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Ronald,

Since the document is dedicated to the algorithms and = elliptic curve parameters, it would be very helpful if you could point = at papers with their analysis in English, if some of them are not = publicly available (or could not be easily found via public resources). = Also, it will be extremely important if you could provide some materials = with design rationale of the algorithms and parameters presented in the = I-D. 

Of = course, full cryptanalysis from a scratch is impossible to be made as a = part of review, so all known results/attacks/notes on design = rationale/results of evaluation of curve parameters will be very = important for making the review(s) as objective as possible.

Best = regards,
Stanislav Smyshlyaev, Ph.D.
Head of Information Security Department,
CryptoPro LLC



2017-11-28 18:47 GMT+03:00 = Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>:
Dear Stanislav,

Thank you very much for performing the review. Look = forward to it!

Kind regards,
Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Alexey,

I'll be happy to do this.

Will it be OK, if I provide a review by the 20th of = December?

Best regards,

Stanislav



2017-11-28 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexey Melnikov = <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:
Dear Crypto Panel,

SAAG=E2=80=99s SECDISPATCH chairs have requested review of
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ribose-openpgp-oscca/>
before the document fate will be decided (it is likely to end up in the = CURDLE WG).

Can we have some volunteer(s) please?

The draft Abstract is:

   This document enables OpenPGP (RFC4880) usage in an = compliant manner
   with OSCCA (Office of State Commercial Cipher = Administration)
   regulations for use within China.

   Specifically, it extends OpenPGP to support the usage of = SM2, SM3 and
   SM4 algorithms, and provides the OSCCA-compliant OpenPGP = profile
   "OSCCA-SM234".


Thank you,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel






= --Apple-Mail=_0638B6A6-64B7-4C39-ADB6-20BBF275E853-- --Apple-Mail=_4083E44F-562F-4538-89E7-24B6CE458600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEVqvqh2I10lDVb5euPK6eITJcoCwFAloe+1wACgkQPK6eITJc oCw6OA//bAZzYM0TnT17+f49XsVOewUUb6YhKhh6Z6tfD8IbvH/rS4No3+SMi+eo 4dDaPq+BOygwYf4PZ4R5xbU+ONXhaZ8n39wDA0YHhwU7zRX3HQr3xE23KvwtJfw+ wDadNlhA0ZPhkiLb/1ss/lenkvuQv+hqSXXEL/dUZw45wbe4F7XFF5af9ik+WI4j +sppc6nY3FZCJHQ1oe1e60OLFF8o85V1CcuRYT5JhowY7r2Pj1xPaBqtapOos1eQ 7yGXMrF6S2O+8x8JyliFWsvNkNq+qd8L+WpnGdI/QLYzngqXAlhc64a+evTMkJ9w j8+6G7wCBR4Xeh63zHBIQdQmelf6KbtHtPocMvpPLBbXnNjNomVc0bhN8oQymAcE Zck+K17ushB856PIjTBr0CI/8C/NhNHGD5ebWdQKfumubDU1sM0hWLHwtBw6nQSx 9IvavHju5Evn5S0makVff3IdOW9D9hpt4pgf7mEDI89vLyiy/kqbVbjStW0hgQYQ /t5gvHS5sADs/a0nHlEqc1i6YdbsIqt1S7rdFPL5XGdmL4ZuKn68LS+xrJ9TNs1t cBvLx7V3HciJ72Nr0rAGO0ISLK3kLBSKXmQvzWg02kF5TRO3Zg0qqkBK2DQyriiv VxWKpSuLZcVW6qx9OQ4hOnh14JfkAqTNkN43PyFDV4CZPBxAVhQ= =1MU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4083E44F-562F-4538-89E7-24B6CE458600--