Subject: RE: Configuration model vs. DMTF model

From: "Jason, Jamie" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:05:49 -0800

In addition, it was decided after the WG session on Monday night that in the
I-D a clear distinction between what parts of the policy represents settings
that are required by the RFCs and what parts should be considered extensions
will be made.

Jamie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Rafalow [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 7:04 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: Configuration model vs. DMTF model
> 
> 
> It's a subset.  For example, the DMTF model includes security 
> association
> objects as well as the objects necessary to specify the policies.
> 
> Lee
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 8:50 PM
> Subject: Configuration model vs. DMTF model
> 
> 
> > We know that the ipsp IPsec configuration model is based on 
> that of DMTF.
> > But to be more specific, is the ipsp model the same, a superset or a
> subset
> > of that of DMTF?
> >
> >
> > Man Li
> > Nokia
> > 5 Wayside Road, Burlington, MA 01803
> > [email-masked]
> > phone 1-781-993-3923
> > GSM 1-781-492-2850
> 
>