Subject: New link relations

From: Jan Algermissen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:01:23 +0200

Erik and James,

I agree with Barry's remark on adding the section number to the registration information.

I don't have any issues with the three drafts, but I have an itch that I should scan the registry and the drafts for semantic overlap.

I'll do that and get back to you.

I am wondering a little whether we are re-inventing RDF/RDFS and Dublin Core as link relations here. Two questions:

- How to draw the line what of the core RDF&friends semantics make a useful link relation

- Is the probably a way of dealing with 'linked data' in HTTP messages?

Just asking...

Jan