From ananth@cisco.com Sun Apr 1 07:40:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB3F21F8E25 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLBc20B88ZKu for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE721F8E21 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; l=5707; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333291226; x=1334500826; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=iUP2stS2KZ838ZHdnkJlQkAgPBxmjCoOnLwWhLB56Qg=; b=AeiwlL1nZEL02eIqdYJSUrP6Deay8/Tk7GrORWEOhhL/GLwZEENdFfMV KseVsQFxpIHjWkG6rcDaz6+vKb+loMcAsSmut2pZFuqFptTG2jNvHm3aT Lriqrr9wJPfMSzl3zQNywt+SzK8TNelArL8HGRerjv8qFeXaYCx4QpSpR s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKloeE+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABEgka2OIEHggsBBBIBCREDSRIBKgYYB1cBBBsah2YBmzSeCY14gkFjBIhYm1CBaIMH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,353,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="36004116" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2012 14:40:16 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q31EeG9o015192; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:40:16 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-23e.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.15]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:16 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD1015.5A63DBD5" Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1F8E0A684D3FF54680294BCFE57A7DB504C92890@xmb-sjc-23e.amer.cisco.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Next steps. Thread-Index: Ac0QFVnqG3uUBBolQ2qgrl1A2I/lPQ== From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2012 14:40:16.0373 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A95B250:01CD1015] Cc: Pasi Sarolahti Subject: [middisc] Next steps. X-BeenThere: middisc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions on TCP option for middlebox discovery." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:40:27 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CD1015.5A63DBD5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks, During this IETF in Paris, I had to chance to speak to Wes on the remaining items moving forward on this draft. They are :- - We need to revise the draft with all the comments received and submit the next version. I hope to incorporate these comments soon and send it out for review. - Pasi (who is the TCPM co-chair) would be involved in doing a proto-write up after reviewing the draft and suggesting any comments. Thanks for your time and volunteering to do the review and write-up, Pasi. =20 One stuff which I would like to know is "what is the TCP option number used by Citrix for middlebox auto-discovery?" We have all (major ones) other players TCP option number's it would be nice to put Citrix if we have that. I remember that there is a Citrix person in this alias. There is a also a person from Juniper in this alias. If they are indeed doing Wan-Opt and using unassigned TCP option numbers, please speak up. =20 Thanks, -Anantha ------_=_NextPart_001_01CD1015.5A63DBD5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks,

        During this = IETF in Paris, I had to chance to speak to Wes on the remaining items = moving forward on this draft. They are :-

-          = We need to revise the draft with all the = comments received and submit the next version. I hope to incorporate = these comments soon and send it out for review.

-          = Pasi (who is the TCPM co-chair) would be = involved in doing a proto-write up after reviewing the draft and = suggesting any comments. Thanks for your time and volunteering to do the = review and write-up, Pasi.

 

One stuff = which I would like to know is “what is the TCP option number used = by Citrix for middlebox auto-discovery?” We have all (major ones) = other players TCP option number’s it would be nice to put Citrix = if we have that. I remember that there is a Citrix person in this alias. = There is a also a person from Juniper in this alias. If they are indeed = doing Wan-Opt and using unassigned TCP option numbers, please speak = up.

 

Thanks,

-Anantha

------_=_NextPart_001_01CD1015.5A63DBD5--