Subject: Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.txt

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:57:45 +0100

Dear all,

I started the IETF last call process on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.

Regards, Benoit
> [Speaking as co-chair]
>
> 	Benoit,
>
> 	I believe the document is now ready for your AD review.
>
> 	—Tom
>
>
>
>> On Jan 22, 2016:8:37 PM, at 8:37 PM, Kent Watsen <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [As a contributor]
>>
>> This update contains the following changes:
>>
>>
>> 1) removed “(see term)” throughout
>>
>> 2) moved 2nd-half of the Asynchronous Configuration Operation term to new requirement 2-B
>>
>> 3) moved the Backwards Compatibility to new requirement 5
>>
>> 4) made some may/MAY/SHOULD/MUST changes (as discussed on list)
>>
>> 5) replaced map/mapping with relate/relationships
>>
>>
>> Please see the diff for details.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/16, 8:29 PM, "netmod on behalf of [email-masked]" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>>        Title           : Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State
>>>        Authors         : Kent Watsen
>>>                          Thomas Nadeau
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 6
>>> 	Date            : 2016-01-22
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This document primarily regards the difference between the intended
>>>   configuration and the applied configuration of a device and how
>>>   intended and applied configuration relate to the operational state of
>>>   a device.  This document defines requirements for the applied
>>>   configuration's data model and its values, as well as for enabling a
>>>   client to know when a configuration has been fully applied or not,
>>>   how to access operational state, and how to relate intended
>>>   configuration nodes to applied configuration and derived state nodes.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs/
>>>
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> yang-doctors mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors