Subject: [pm-dir] PM dir - Review of RTCP XR Report Block for Concealment metrics Reporting on Audio Applications

From: Vinayak Hegde <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 08:11:18 +0530

Hi draft authors / PM-dir,

I did a review of the  RTCP XR Report Block for Concealment metrics
Reporting on Audio Applications (version 5)
Link - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05

The draft is well written and conforms to RFC 6390 template for performance
metric definition. I have only some small nitpicks to improve clarity and
comprehension. Comments follow:
===
1.1
SCS threshold fixed (constant) - how is it communicated to the receiver ?
Please add a reference to the definition later in the draft.

3.2. Definition of Fields in Loss Concealment Report Block

VAD acronym is not defined at first use though it is defined and referenced
further down in the draft. Please reference it here to improve clarity.

-- Vinayak