From bclaise@cisco.com  Sun Dec  1 14:07:22 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBB11AE1C6 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  1 Dec 2013 14:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50GXAIcC6Heb for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  1 Dec 2013 14:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96E21AE1A0 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  1 Dec 2013 14:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB1M7IV7000468 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:07:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB1M70Mx025220 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:07:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id rB1M6xjJ029105 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:06:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:06:59 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131201220659.GA29103@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:07:22 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-00                      Active	
draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	

From bclaise@cisco.com  Sun Dec  8 14:07:29 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36F31AE13E for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Dec 2013 14:07:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Goyo4t2xeOAo for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Dec 2013 14:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC81AE072 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Dec 2013 14:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB8M7LWb024711 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:07:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB8M7355028526 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id rB8M70a0008087 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:07:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:07:00 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131208220700.GA8085@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:07:29 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	

From bclaise@cisco.com  Fri Dec 13 09:09:33 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED5E1ADFFE; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVDpP6AbE60Z; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79031ADF9A; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8279; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386954563; x=1388164163; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tPLbMNQeNwofdNmry/lJ7BmI78W2vCckMY0ELFNMtTg=; b=b77j7OUPH8NRnpDbn1XKMAJEuv5/92jkIsz0BNx5raM4VNgie9Afb/nk 4zKxib3aRkRn8v8GXJlOlJbfKBThH7VyQbnZr/IhUXV9J6JpFdmIQK5FO P5c4FG98snr9n/E37AMcvfyC1DK2JRspwTVBklClnoCmWIkDGZhpdCJAA 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFADE+q1KQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABZgwo4g1i1WoElFnSCJgEBBCMVMQEOESUCBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBgEJAwYCAQEXh2kNszWCDJVeF4EpjXOCboFIBJQ0BYNdgTCFFYtPgys7
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,480,1384300800";  d="scan'208";a="1607801"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2013 17:09:21 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBDH9IqG006441; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:18 GMT
Message-ID: <52AB3F3D.7080700@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:09:17 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
References: <20131212234725.11014.97557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131212234725.11014.97557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20131212234725.11014.97557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [pm-dir] PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the December 19, 2013 IESG Teleconference
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:34 -0000

Dear all,


Please find below the agenda of the Dec 19th IESG telechat.
Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Dec 18th COB.

Thanks and Regards, Benoit.


INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the 2013-12-19 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 2013-12-12 15:44:03 PST
Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/
                                                                                 

2. Protocol Actions
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25  - IETF stream
     Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14  - IETF stream
     Diameter Network Access Server Application (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Lionel Morand (lionel.morand@orange.com) is the Document
     Shepherd
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking-09  - IETF stream
     IGMP/MLD-Based Explicit Membership Tracking Function for Multicast
     Routers (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Adrian Farrel
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-05  - IETF stream
     LDP Extensions for Hub & Spoke Multipoint Label Switched Path
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Adrian Farrel
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-09  - IETF stream
     The JSON Data Interchange Format (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Pete Resnick
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11  - IETF stream
     Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation
     Element communication Protocol (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Stewart Bryant
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-6man-ug-06  - IETF stream
     Significance of IPv6 Interface Identifiers (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04  - IETF stream
     RTP Payload Format for Standard apt-X and Enhanced apt-X Codecs
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-02  - IETF stream
     URN For Country Specific Emergency Services (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-01  - IETF stream
     Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Management Policy to IETF
     Review (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07  - IETF stream
     Ethernet in the First Mile Copper (EFMCu) Interfaces MIB (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

2.1.2 Returning Items

   NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items

   o draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04  - IETF stream
     IETF Guidelines for Conduct (Best Current Practice)
     Token: Jari Arkko
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

2.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

2.3 Status Changes
2.3.1 New Items

   NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
3.1.1 New Items

   o draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14  - IETF stream
     Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a
     Single Media Security Solution (Informational)
     Note: Tom Taylor (tom111.taylor@bell.net) is PROTO Shepherd.
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-09  - IETF stream
     Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication Scheme
     Registrations (Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14  - IETF stream
     Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations
     (Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-10  - IETF stream
     How to Write an RTP Payload Format (Informational)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-jose-use-cases-05  - IETF stream
     Use Cases and Requirements for JSON Object Signing and Encryption
     (JOSE) (Informational)
     Token: Sean Turner
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09  - IETF stream
     Options for Securing RTP Sessions (Informational)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

3.1.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
3.2.1 New Items

   o draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-05  - IETF stream
     Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element
     (Informational)
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-bundesbank-eurosystem-namespace-02  - IETF stream
     A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Eurosystem Messaging
     (Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

3.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.3 Status Changes
3.3.1 New Items

   o status-change-std1-to-historic-01  - IETF stream
     STD1 (RFC5000) To Historic (None)
     Token: Pete Resnick

3.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents
3.4.1 New Items

   o conflict-review-lanthaler-profile-registry-00
     IETF conflict review for draft-lanthaler-profile-registry
       draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-04
       The Profile URI Registry (ISE: Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba

3.4.2 Returning Items

   o conflict-review-wkumari-dnsop-defense-collision-mitigate-00
     IETF conflict review for
     draft-wkumari-dnsop-defense-collision-mitigate
       draft-wkumari-dnsop-defense-collision-mitigate-03
       A method for mitigating namespace collisions (ISE: Informational)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

   NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

   o Service Function Chaining (sfc)

4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

   NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

   o Multiple Interfaces (mif)






From bclaise@cisco.com  Sun Dec 15 14:07:22 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F851ADDD0 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.439
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZfSpXprrnOIA for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFD31AD8D8 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBFM7Jq5019690 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:07:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBFM71Yu007603 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:07:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id rBFM71H2022097 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:07:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:07:01 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131215220701.GA22095@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:07:22 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	

From janovak@cisco.com  Mon Dec 16 07:57:38 2013
Return-Path: <janovak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572951AE363 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:57:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paL9luCL222Z for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ECA1AE02D for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:57:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1199; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387209456; x=1388419056; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oYq8dHEo5yHi+lN7zevhgYqD1O+XaW7Q7BBJmArNXeQ=; b=Az58eox8QgYFl8+vp/vvCoV7271YhptH1r2MwxMCwZG+KMqYvJAnvKHl c2A6qsuQ/cMwQufp7knZhF1k7OkTHie7+s4ubkk5gmf0dJOnwXiRl2O7z MXImn6h2MwuQ5JjAaSIEZwwi6aYiem+Owzq2ro5L3Kvprm50u9d+4x/on I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAMshr1KtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgwqBDbhygSUWdIInAQQ6PxIBKhRCJgEEDg0Rh2vIHBeOaDGDKoETBKoqgyqCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,495,1384300800";  d="scan'208";a="7106367"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2013 15:57:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBGFvYoY020374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:57:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.155]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:57:34 -0600
From: "Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak@cisco.com>
To: "acmorton@att.com" <acmorton@att.com>
Thread-Topic: PM-DIR review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00
Thread-Index: Ac76d4eGVTxK8vAMTzCmJh1HszYE4Q==
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:57:33 +0000
Message-ID: <F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFE0F925471@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.147.134.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: [pm-dir] PM-DIR review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:57:38 -0000

Hi Al,

As promised what feels like life-time ago (after 3 weeks
in really thin air - for me at least - with no energy left
to retain any memories of the times before :-)) I have=20
read through this draft:

draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                   =20

It uses the metrics defined by the IPPM RFCs 2679, 2680
and 2681 in very detailed manner - looked like RFC6390 was
inspired by those :-).

The section 2.2 with the metric definitions for the purpose of
this document might benefit from clearer references to the IPPM
work:

1) The packet delay definitions refer to RFC6905 which then
just refers to 2679 and 2681

2) Packet Loss misses the reference at all, I just assumed it would be RFC2=
680 (if not a RFC6390 compliant definition would be needed)

3) Far-end and near-end loss definitions need the reference as well
and probably a bit of text explaining it is just a variance of the=20
RFC2680 definition specific for the TRILL environment but without
a need for another fully blown definition

Regards, Jan=20

The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the stron=
g envy them ....
                                 Dr. Johnson



From bclaise@cisco.com  Sun Dec 22 14:07:26 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD811AE27A for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.439
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BkjNDlGIlVDj for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485CB1AE0AD for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBMM7Lks019245 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:07:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBMM74B9023236 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:07:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id rBMM71uB004547 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:07:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:07:01 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131222220701.GA4545@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 22:07:27 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	

From bclaise@cisco.com  Sun Dec 29 14:07:29 2013
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D811D1AE31B for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:07:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.439
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9g9iuP1N9N6 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB351AE31D for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:07:27 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBTM7L1t023136 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:07:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBTM74jH025813 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:07:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id rBTM749b010925 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:07:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:07:04 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131229220704.GA10923@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:07:30 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active	
draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active