
From nobody Sun Jun  1 14:06:53 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBA61A008C for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isVO5JFlqEiH for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE0F11A0086 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  1 Jun 2014 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s51L6ftr026767 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:06:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s51L69Dh011599 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s51L69q6019160 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:06:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:06:09 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140601210609.GA19158@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/EpLgvcDHFwGWvXo5ovUPYUN57Ho
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 21:06:51 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-03    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement sent>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-05                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-16                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-03    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
-draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
+draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
-draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed>	
-draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
+draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement sent>	
+draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
-draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-14                    Active	
-draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-03                    Active	
+draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
+draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	


From nobody Sun Jun  8 14:06:34 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F161A0444 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jun 2014 14:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rze03C7iRUdb for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jun 2014 14:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC901A043D for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Jun 2014 14:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s58L6Qk4003726 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:06:27 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s58L67Lt014322 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 23:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s58L67gc013499 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 23:06:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 23:06:07 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140608210607.GA13495@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/TwR0bHfpEnStwUyonm87kouv6tw
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 21:06:32 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-05                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-16                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
-draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement sent>	
+draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
-draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
+draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
-draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation>	
+draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-03    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
+draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	


From nobody Sun Jun 15 13:06:55 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEA41B2961 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.152
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFiMLdwFWucI for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94C11B296E for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FK6UDi025595 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:06:31 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (sweet-brew-1.cisco.com [144.254.10.202]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FK6Aaq026354 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id s5FK6Ai4013873 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:06:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:06:10 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140615200610.GA13863@sweet-brew-1.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/jZZ0AQzAtzPCW8zv4LPUQ-mUPXM
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:40 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-06                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
-draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
-draft-ietf-lmap-framework-05                      Active	
+draft-ietf-lmap-framework-06                      Active	
-draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
-draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-16                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
+draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	


From nobody Sun Jun 15 14:06:34 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A32A1B2961 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2u5BJKLAJlGN for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A021A009A for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FL6ODx029931 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 06:06:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FL65sV015652 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s5FL650X028558 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:05 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140615210605.GA28547@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Kg_lmFBCQ7VA0hl3A6LRJnXwtyk
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:06:30 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-06                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
No differences encountered


From nobody Sun Jun 22 13:06:24 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F001A0294 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.852
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8R3kjzzkr0DC for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E161A025D for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5MK6GSm029673 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:06:18 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (sweet-brew-1.cisco.com [144.254.10.202]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5MK5u30014117 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id s5MK5uSk020060 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:05:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:05:56 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140622200556.GA20050@sweet-brew-1.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/x430cSkMyDdTPRJiQUGPbKn5s1Y
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 20:06:23 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-06                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
-draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
+draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-04                      Active	
-draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
+draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
-draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
+draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	


From nobody Mon Jun 23 14:12:29 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7346D1B2BFA; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.452
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udtvrcVQB3Kp; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0361B2C3E; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4834; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403557934; x=1404767534; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I0WqsR1AJrX71LeyFMdjfHvR7oBQgkERkvs6A7ClH44=; b=P+FsuK+0pAyJjpZMFlEn9CmD4oLak/+G49byilFLmZiwanYUiK6mKmnf u3qD8wPWE15S081J0vVOUpEWWnWHq+aLJWNhpj+0z/NEDa89OGwB2qUJM m8F3Zqefz1Khv1jLFfr4atSJwKV/jeEEv1zi81SCtauw5HH54gNnyCPtf E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIEAHOXqFOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABQCYNfqx0BAQEBAQeZNQGBJnWEAwEBAQQ4QA0ELBYPCQMCAQIBOwoGAQwGAgEBiD4Nw1MTBIVjhXeCQAcKAVeEQwEDmkyGfYxmggCBRDuBOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,532,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="92044573"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2014 21:12:10 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5NLC9Hd013200; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:12:09 GMT
Message-ID: <53A89829.1010407@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:12:09 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
References: <20140619223558.21435.31164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140619223558.21435.31164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140619223558.21435.31164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/t7HV5NQn_uUmTHLLqm4CfrvkVJY
Subject: [pm-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2014-06-26 IESG Teleconference
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:12:18 -0000

Dear all,

Please find below the agenda of the June 26th IESG telechat.
Please send your questions, comments and concerns before June 25th COB.

Thanks and Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------

INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the 2014-06-26 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 2014-06-19 15:34:10 PDT
Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/



2. Protocol Actions
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05  - IETF stream
     An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers
     Version 2 (ORCHIDv2) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Ted Lemon
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14  - IETF stream
     Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Ted Lemon
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-05  - IETF stream
     Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with
     the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Ted Lemon
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-14  - IETF stream
     Self-tuning Distributed Hash Table (DHT) for REsource LOcation And
     Discovery (RELOAD) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Alissa Cooper
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip-03  - IETF stream
     IPv4 Service Continuity Prefix (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate-07  - IETF stream
     Sieve Email Filtering: Detecting Duplicate Deliveries (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03  - IETF stream
     Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) as Transport for Session
     Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Spencer Dawkins
     IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed
     Consensus: Unknown
     Last call expires: 2014-06-25

2.1.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-17  - IETF stream
     Automatic Multicast Tunneling (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Lenny Giuliano (lenny@juniper.net) is the Document Shepherd.
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items
     
   o draft-salgueiro-dispatch-websocket-sipclf-01  - IETF stream
     Indicating WebSocket Protocol as a Transport in the Session
     Initiation Protocol (SIP) Common Log Format (CLF) (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

2.2.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-06  - IETF stream
     Mesh Link Establishment (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Robert Cragie (robert.cragie@gridmerge.com) is the document
     shepherd.
     Token: Ted Lemon
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

2.3 Status Changes
2.3.1 New Items

   NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
3.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05  - IETF stream
     Enterprise IPv6 Deployment Guidelines (Informational)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

3.1.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
3.2.1 New Items
     
   o draft-adolf-dvb-urn-upd-00  - IETF stream
     Update to the Registrant Information for the Digital Video
     Broadcasting Project (DVB) Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace
     (Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

3.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.3 Status Changes
3.3.1 New Items

   NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents
3.4.1 New Items

   o conflict-review-wilde-xml-patch-00
     IETF conflict review for draft-wilde-xml-patch
       draft-wilde-xml-patch-10
       A Media Type for XML Patch Operations (ISE: Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba

3.4.2 Returning Items

   NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

   o Transport Services (taps)

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

   o TCP Increased Security (tcpinc)

4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

   NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

   o Domain Name System Operations (dnsop)




