
From mko@cs.stir.ac.uk  Tue Jan 17 05:20:11 2012
Return-Path: <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD2F21F85D0 for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:20:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zCoMdS-UvmR for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:20:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bannock.stir.ac.uk (bannock.stir.ac.uk [139.153.12.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE1221F85D5 for <sam@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.13.214]) by bannock.stir.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>) id 1Rn8wp-0002Hl-Ig for sam@irtf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:19:35 +0000
Received: from d253090.cs.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.253.90]) by smtp.stir.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>) id 1Rn8wp-0008EU-Bp for sam@irtf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:19:35 +0000
Message-ID: <4F157566.7090002@cs.stir.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:19:34 +0000
From: Dr Mario Kolberg <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sam <sam@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner-ID: 1Rn8wp-0002Hl-Ig
X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Subject: [SAM] message types in ID Application Layer Multicast Extensions to RELOAD
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:20:11 -0000

Hi All,

we are currently extending the draft with ALM example algorithms. We 
have included Scribe and are new working on P2PCast. P2PCast is similar 
to Splitstream (using multiple subtrees for parts of the data) but does 
not assume specific overlays. When nodes join/leave the P2PCast ALM tree 
some reorganisation of the tree may be required. This requires some 
messaging between tree nodes with P2PCast specific messages. The draft 
currently contains a message REFORM which could be used for this 
purpose, in which the P2PCast messages could be wrapped by the REFORM 
message. An alternative to using REFORM is to create a separate message 
which would contain the P2PCast messages.

I would be interested in any views as to which option you'd prefer, 
either using REFORM or setting up a new message type.

Many thanks,
Mario Kolberg



-- 
The Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2009/2010
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, 
 number SC 011159.


From prvs=366b1099d=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de  Fri Jan 27 12:58:02 2012
Return-Path: <prvs=366b1099d=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CBD21F8712 for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mr6z2tXmFjZR for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5521F85DD for <sam@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.30.74]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 27 Jan 2012 21:57:59 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC2B104CDE8; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:57:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16843-09; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:57:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.178.36] (e178058053.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.58.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55D3E1065DA5; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:57:59 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F230FD5.7030204@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:57:57 +0100
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sam <sam@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de
Subject: [SAM] Paris Meeting
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:58:02 -0000

Folks,

we have tentatively scheduled a meeting in Paris. Please let us know 
about agenda requests ASAP.

Best,

John & Thomas
-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °

From waehlisch@ieee.org  Fri Jan 27 12:58:41 2012
Return-Path: <waehlisch@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633C621F8723 for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.287
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDM-jY1UCV9m for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de (mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de [141.45.10.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5EF21F8717 for <sam@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Envelope-to: sam@irtf.org
Received: from e178058053.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.58.53] helo=mw-PC.fritz.box) by mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <waehlisch@ieee.org>) id 1RqssY-0002dH-H6 for sam@irtf.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:58:38 +0100
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:58:41 +0100
From: Matthias Waehlisch <waehlisch@ieee.org>
To: sam <sam@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1201272155260.5908@mw-PC>
X-X-Sender: mw@mail2.rz.fhtw-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-HTW-SPAMINFO: this message was scanned by eXpurgate (http://www.eleven.de)
X-HTW-DELIVERED-TO: sam@irtf.org
Subject: [SAM] New Version Notification for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-04.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:58:41 -0000

Hi folks,

  according to comments and as discussed in the last meeting, we did the 
following changes:

   1.  Added section "Illustrative Example"
   2.  Added section "Implementation"
   3.  Minor clarifications


  We think the draft is ready for last call, now.


Cheers
  matthias


-- 
Matthias Waehlisch
.  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
.  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:waehlisch@ieee.org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:55:10 -0800
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: mw@link-lab.net
Cc: schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de, mw@link-lab.net, stig@cisco.com
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-04.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-irtf-samrg-common-api-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Matthias Waehlisch and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-irtf-samrg-common-api
Revision:	 04
Title:		 A Common API for Transparent Hybrid Multicast
Creation date:	 2012-01-27
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 37

Abstract:
   Group communication services exist in a large variety of flavors, and
   technical implementations at different protocol layers.  Multicast
   data distribution is most efficiently performed on the lowest
   available layer, but a heterogeneous deployment status of multicast
   technologies throughout the Internet requires an adaptive service
   binding at runtime.  Today, it is difficult to write an application
   that runs everywhere and at the same time makes use of the most
   efficient multicast service available in the network.  Facing
   robustness requirements, developers are frequently forced to use a
   stable, upper layer protocol provided by the application itself.
   This document describes a common multicast API that is suitable for
   transparent communication in underlay and overlay, and grants access
   to the different multicast flavors.  It proposes an abstract naming
   by multicast URIs and discusses mapping mechanisms between different
   namespaces and distribution technologies.  Additionally, it describes
   the application of this API for building gateways that interconnect
   current multicast domains throughout the Internet.

                                                                                  


The IETF Secretariat
